From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH] ravb: add R8A7791 support Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:22:19 +0900 Message-ID: <20151201062218.GD16260@verge.net.au> References: <6051623.qN4lqSyZKg@wasted.cogentembedded.com> <565B6AAD.8080205@cogentembedded.com> <20151130004207.GD3501@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-sh list , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 09:08:57AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:14:21AM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > >> On 11/29/2015 10:26 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> >>Add support for yet another ARM member of the R-Car family, R-Car M2, also > >> >R-Car M2-W? > >> > >> Right, forgot about the postfixes. > >> > >> >>known as R8A7791. > >> > > >> >There's also R-Car M2-N, aka R8A7793, but you probably know that ;-) > >> > >> Will fix. > > > > I would prefer if we added generic gen2 and gen3 compat strings to the driver > > and only documented new soc-specific compat strings. > > > > Actually by chance I was planning to up patches to do that and add compat > > strings for the missing Gen2 boards. But I won't complain if you beat me to > > it. > > You're aware we have to keep the existing SoC-specific ones in the driver, > for backwards compatibility? Yes, I am aware of that.