From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH] ravb: add R8A7791 support Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:24:37 +0900 Message-ID: <20151201062437.GE16260@verge.net.au> References: <6051623.qN4lqSyZKg@wasted.cogentembedded.com> <565B6AAD.8080205@cogentembedded.com> <20151130004207.GD3501@verge.net.au> <565C9EA6.309@cogentembedded.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <565C9EA6.309@cogentembedded.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-sh list , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:08:22PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 11/30/2015 03:42 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > >>>>Add support for yet another ARM member of the R-Car family, R-Car M2, also > >> > >>>R-Car M2-W? > >> > >> Right, forgot about the postfixes. > >> > >>>>known as R8A7791. > >>> > >>>There's also R-Car M2-N, aka R8A7793, but you probably know that ;-) > >> > >> Will fix. > > > >I would prefer if we added generic gen2 and gen3 compat strings to the driver > >and only documented new soc-specific compat strings. > > That's a new policy it seems. Previously you preferred the SoC-specific > strings to be used, didn;t you? Yes, that is correct on all counts. To clarify new policy for Renesas IP is: soc-specific compat + generic compat as fallback > >Actually by chance I was planning to up patches to do that and add compat > >strings for the missing Gen2 boards. But I won't complain if you beat me to > >it. > > No, I'm pretty busy as is. :-) Ok, I'll handle this.