From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/18] ARM: am57xx: cl-som-am57x: dts: add basic module support Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 08:43:17 -0800 Message-ID: <20151201164317.GS23396@atomide.com> References: <1448433590-1399-2-git-send-email-lifshitz@compulab.co.il> <1448893551-676-1-git-send-email-lifshitz@compulab.co.il> <20151130215415.GE23396@atomide.com> <565DC9CC.1070000@compulab.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <565DC9CC.1070000-UTxiZqZC01RS1MOuV/RT9w@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Dmitry Lifshitz Cc: linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Igor Grinberg , Nikita Kiryanov , Ian Campbell , Nishanth Menon List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org * Dmitry Lifshitz [151201 08:26]: > > It might looks the same set of regulators for multiple boards, > but it is not. Each board may apply its own regulators usage scheme, and > this is our case (as compared to am57xx-beagle-x15.dts). > > For the best of my knowledge, it used to be in a common *.dtsi file (at > least in early OMAP5 DT support in TI kernel tree), but then I found that > PMIC registration had been moved to the boards DT files. Have you actually looked at how much of the implementation is same across the omap5 boards? My guess is that a whole lot is same.. See for example omap5-board-common.dtsi. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html