From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Norris Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.4 2/2] doc: dt: mtd: partitions: add compatible property to "partitions" node Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 17:12:56 -0800 Message-ID: <20151209011256.GV120110@google.com> References: <1449194529-145705-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> <1449194529-145705-2-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> <20151207175835.GM120110@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151207175835.GM120110@google.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+gldm-linux-mtd-36=gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Jonas Gorski Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Michal Suchanek , Boris Brezillon , Simon Arlott , Rob Herring , MTD Maling List List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 09:58:35AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 12:45:36PM +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Brian Norris > > wrote: > > > // proposed > > > partitions { > > > compatible = "partitions"; > > > > "partitions" sounds mode like a device_type thing than a compatible > > name, maybe "fixed-partitions"? IMHO that would describe better what > > these are, and doesn't invite to think using compatible = > > "arm,arm-flash-structure", "partitions"; is a good idea. > > "fixed-partitions" sounds OK to me. If no objections, I'll apply these > patches, with (approximately) a: > > s/"partitions"/"fixed-partitions"/ Pushed to linux-mtd.git with the above change. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/