From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] cpufreq: Introduce ST's CPUFreq driver Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 07:42:07 +0530 Message-ID: <20151210021207.GC29459@ubuntu> References: <1449676697-25432-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1449676697-25432-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, maxime.coquelin@st.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, ajitpal.singh@st.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 09-12-15, 15:58, Lee Jones wrote: > This is a re-write of the original submission, hence why the > change-log is omitted. Basically almost everything has changed. > We are now using the new OPP framework and generic bindings > written by Viresh. > > There are 'ARM' patches in the set which are not necessarily > related to CPUFreq, but are required to get it to work. Anyone > who is not interested in general STi DT changes can safely > ignore these. Apart from minor comments in the 8th patch, everything else looks fine. Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar -- viresh