From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: regulator/mfd: Reorganize S2MPA01 bindings Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 07:56:49 +0000 Message-ID: <20160111075649.GO3331@x1> References: <1449191405-3344-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <1449191405-3344-4-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <20151204121153.GZ26072@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151204121153.GZ26072@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Sangbeom Kim , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Kukjin Kim , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Liam Girdwood , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 04 Dec 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:10:05AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > The mfd/s2mpa01.txt duplicates some of the information about bindin= gs > > with old mfd/s2mps11.txt. Now common part exists entirely in > > mfd/samsung,sec-core.txt so: >=20 > Acked-by: Mark Brown >=20 > > - add company prefix to file name (regulator/samsung,s2mpa01.txt), >=20 > I'm not 100% convinced about these prefixes BTW, the duplication isn'= t > usually an issue within a subsystem. They don't do any harm either > though. I think they're ugly and would prefer not to accept them, but lots of people are submitting them now and I can't be bothered to fight it, so meh! --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog