From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lothar =?UTF-8?B?V2HDn21hbm4=?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: imx6: add support for Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 module Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 12:10:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20160113121012.0c924bc8@ipc1.ka-ro> References: <1452621710-15336-1-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> <1452621710-15336-2-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> <87h9iigce7.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87h9iigce7.fsf@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Holger Schurig Cc: Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Mark Rutland , Pawel Moll , Rob Herring , Russell King , Sascha Hauer , Shawn Guo , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, > Lothar Wa=C3=9Fmann writes: >=20 > > +/ { > > + model =3D "Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 Module"; > > + compatible =3D "karo,imx6dl-tx6dl", "fsl,imx6dl"; > > + timestamp =3D __DATE__, __TIME__; >=20 > Is this needed or useful? >=20 > There's a movement that aims to do "reproducible builds" ... being > able to recompile an image and verify it against the supplied can be > helpful for security audit purposes. >=20 Ooops. I was on the wrong branch when creating these patches. Will resend this patch series soon. > > + display: display@di0 { > > + compatible =3D "fsl,imx-parallel-display"; > > + pinctrl-names =3D "default"; > > + pinctrl-0 =3D <&pinctrl_disp0_1>; > > + interface-pix-fmt =3D "rgb24"; > > +// fsl,panel =3D <&lcd0_panel>; >=20 > Probably not for upstream inclusion? > see above.