From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mtd: augment the "arm,versatile-flash" bindings Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:02:55 -0600 Message-ID: <20160126220255.GA13707@rob-hp-laptop> References: <1453806725-4880-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <1453806725-4880-2-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1453806725-4880-2-git-send-email-linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Grant Likely , Arnd Bergmann , Mark Rutland List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:12:00PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > The bindings for the "arm,versatile-flash" device was merged in > commit 3ba7222ac992d24d09ccd0b55940b54849eef752 > "arm/versatile: Add device tree support" but was never used > for anything. > > Versatile flash chips are actually just standard CFI chips, > but they have one or two bits in a system controller to control > VPP and write protection. Let's use this compatible string in > conjunction with "cfi-flash" to indicate that we have a > normal CFI flash with some extra Versatile-specific protection. > > Cc: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > Cc: Grant Likely > Cc: Rob Herring > Cc: Arnd Bergmann > Cc: Mark Rutland > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/arm-versatile.txt | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Acked-by: Rob Herring -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html