From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] clk: sunxi: Refactor A31 PLL6 so that it can be reused Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:41:12 +0000 Message-ID: <20160210184112.GC28728@leverpostej> References: <1454358000-13594-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <56B4E2FB.3050703@arm.com> <20160210125936.GD31506@lukather> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160210125936.GD31506@lukather> Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Andre Przywara , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jean-Francois Moine , Vishnu Patekar , Mike Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Hans de Goede , Jens Kuske , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Grant Likely , devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 01:59:36PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Also this totally ignores any other DT user (U-Boot, FreeBSD, you > > name it). > > Which all have their own DT copies, with their own bindings, that we > (ie Linux) never agreed on. The FreeBSD guys are actually trying to align with the Linux DTs, which they periodically import (at least for arm64). From everything I've seen the U-Boot guys generally want to align with Linux, and have been attempting to some extent to do so (e.g. submitting bindings). So if anything, Linux DTs are being used by others who didn't have much say on them, rather than the other way around. Regardless, the existece of fragmentation is not a good argument for more fragmentation. Thanks, Mark.