From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Cochran Subject: Re: breaking DT compatibility (was: Re: [PATCH v4] clk: sunxi: Refactor A31 PLL6 so that it can be reused) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:51:58 +0100 Message-ID: <20160211145158.GA8824@localhost.localdomain> References: <1454358000-13594-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <56B4E2FB.3050703@arm.com> <56BB2D79.6090402@arm.com> <20160210143755.GE31506@lukather> <20160210163001.GG2632@leverpostej> <20160211100048.GK31506@lukather> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160211100048.GK31506@lukather> Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Mark Rutland , linux-arm-kernel , Rob Herring , Vishnu Patekar , Jean-Francois Moine , Andre Przywara , Mike Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Hans de Goede , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jens Kuske , Grant Likely , Frank Rowand , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:00:48AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > None of our existing users ever complained. Note to self: Avoid choosing this SoC for new projects. The maintainers do not care about the end users. Thanks, Richard