From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Richter Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/8] dt, numa: adding numa dt binding implementation. Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:32:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20160211153255.GR24726@rric.localdomain> References: <1454407763-1017-1-git-send-email-gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> <1454407763-1017-4-git-send-email-gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Rob Herring Cc: Mark Rutland , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, SH-Linux , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Will Deacon , "H. Peter Anvin" , Catalin Marinas , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Pieralisi , Pawel Moll , Al Stone , Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com, "x86@kernel.org" , Ingo Molnar , Mark Salter , rfranz@cavium.com, Len Brown , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , James Hogan , Steve Capper , Arnd Bergmann , Ian Campbell Marc Zyngier List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 11.02.16 08:50:41, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni > wrote: > > dt node parsing for numa topology is done using device property > > numa-node-id and device node distance-map. > > How is it that powerpc doesn't need flat DT parsing for NUMA? Both > arches are memblock based and the binding is similar IIRC, so you > should be able to find a way to do this with the unflattened tree. > Ideally, there should be some common code shared as well. > > Do you have a git tree with this series? I have pushed it here for you: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rric/linux.git/log/?h=thunder/numa-v10 -Robert