From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 08/10] dt, numa: Add NUMA dt binding implementation. Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:36:51 -0600 Message-ID: <20160223193651.GA8491@rob-hp-laptop> References: <1455930799-5371-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> <1455930799-5371-9-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1455930799-5371-9-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: David Daney Cc: Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Ard Biesheuvel , Frank Rowand , Grant Likely , Catalin Marinas , Matt Fleming , linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Ganapatrao Kulkarni , Robert Richter , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, David Daney List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 05:13:17PM -0800, David Daney wrote: > From: Ganapatrao Kulkarni > > ADD device tree node parsing for NUMA topology using device > "numa-node-id" property distance-map. I still want an adequate explanation why NUMA setup cannot be done with an unflattened tree. PowerPC manages to do that and should have a similar init flow being memblock based, so I would expect arm64 can too. Rob