[PATCH 0/3] thermal: exynos: Fixes for vtmu-supply regulator handling

[PATCH 0/3] thermal: exynos: Fixes for vtmu-supply regulator handling

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello,

On a recent patch series to build a PMIC chip as a module [0], Krzysztof
asked me to check if all the consumer drivers, using the resources that
this PMIC provides, already support probe deferral.

While investigating that, I noticed that the Exynos TMU didn't do it so
this series fix that bug and other two minor issues that I noticed while
reviewing the driver and its DT binding.

The series are on top of Krzysztof's patches [1,2,3] not because there's
a dependency but to avoid merge conflicts with in-flight patches. Please
let me know if you prefer to use a different base instead.

[0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/11/857
[1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8345791/
[2]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8345741/
[3]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8345701/

Best regards,
Javier


Javier Martinez Canillas (3):
  thermal: exynos: List vtmu-supply as optional property in DT binding
  thermal: exynos: Use devm_regulator_get_optional() for vtmu
  thermal: exynos: Defer probe if vtmu is present but not registered

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 9 ++++++---
 drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c                         | 4 +++-
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.5.0

[PATCH 1/3] thermal: exynos: List vtmu-supply as optional property in DT binding

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

The Exynos Thermal Management Unit binding says that the vtmu-supply
is optional but is listed in the required properties section. Add an
optional properties section and move the regulator property there.

Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
---

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
index faa62059b5c5..70b4c16c7ed8 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
@@ -41,9 +41,6 @@
 		for current TMU channel
 	-- "tmu_sclk" clock for functional operation of the current TMU
 		channel
-- vtmu-supply: This entry is optional and provides the regulator node supplying
-		voltage to TMU. If needed this entry can be placed inside
-		board/platform specific dts file.
 
 The Exynos TMU supports generating interrupts when reaching given
 temperature thresholds. Number of supported thermal trip points depends
@@ -65,6 +62,12 @@ Following properties are mandatory (depending on SoC):
 - samsung,tmu_default_temp_offset: Default temperature offset
 - samsung,tmu_cal_type: Callibration type
 
+** Optional properties:
+
+- vtmu-supply: This entry is optional and provides the regulator node supplying
+		voltage to TMU. If needed this entry can be placed inside
+		board/platform specific dts file.
+
 Example 1):
 
 	tmu@100C0000 {
-- 
2.5.0

Re: [PATCH 1/3] thermal: exynos: List vtmu-supply as optional property in DT binding

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 19.02.2016 03:19, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The Exynos Thermal Management Unit binding says that the vtmu-supply
> is optional but is listed in the required properties section. Add an
> optional properties section and move the regulator property there.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> ---
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH 0/3] thermal: exynos: Fixes for vtmu-supply regulator handling

[Andi Shyti]

Hi Javier,

> Javier Martinez Canillas (3):
>   thermal: exynos: List vtmu-supply as optional property in DT binding
>   thermal: exynos: Use devm_regulator_get_optional() for vtmu
>   thermal: exynos: Defer probe if vtmu is present but not registered
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 9 ++++++---
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c                         | 4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

for all of them:

Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>

Andi

Re: [PATCH 1/3] thermal: exynos: List vtmu-supply as optional property in DT binding

[Rob Herring]

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 03:19:09PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The Exynos Thermal Management Unit binding says that the vtmu-supply
> is optional but is listed in the required properties section. Add an
> optional properties section and move the regulator property there.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> ---
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Re: [PATCH 0/3] thermal: exynos: Fixes for vtmu-supply regulator handling

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Lukasz, Eduardo,

On 02/18/2016 03:19 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On a recent patch series to build a PMIC chip as a module [0], Krzysztof
> asked me to check if all the consumer drivers, using the resources that
> this PMIC provides, already support probe deferral.
> 
> While investigating that, I noticed that the Exynos TMU didn't do it so
> this series fix that bug and other two minor issues that I noticed while
> reviewing the driver and its DT binding.
> 
> The series are on top of Krzysztof's patches [1,2,3] not because there's
> a dependency but to avoid merge conflicts with in-flight patches. Please
> let me know if you prefer to use a different base instead.
> 
> [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/11/857
> [1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8345791/
> [2]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8345741/
> [3]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8345701/
> 
> Best regards,
> Javier
> 

Any comments about this series?

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

Re: [PATCH 1/3] thermal: exynos: List vtmu-supply as optional property in DT binding

[Eduardo Valentin]

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 03:19:09PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The Exynos Thermal Management Unit binding says that the vtmu-supply
> is optional but is listed in the required properties section. Add an
> optional properties section and move the regulator property there.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> ---
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
> index faa62059b5c5..70b4c16c7ed8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
> @@ -41,9 +41,6 @@
>  		for current TMU channel
>  	-- "tmu_sclk" clock for functional operation of the current TMU
>  		channel
> -- vtmu-supply: This entry is optional and provides the regulator node supplying
> -		voltage to TMU. If needed this entry can be placed inside
> -		board/platform specific dts file.
>  
>  The Exynos TMU supports generating interrupts when reaching given
>  temperature thresholds. Number of supported thermal trip points depends

Where is this patch based on? I checked it on my fixes and linus
branches, also on linux-next 0308 branch, and none of those apply clean.

Can you please send this based on upstream kernel?

> @@ -65,6 +62,12 @@ Following properties are mandatory (depending on SoC):
>  - samsung,tmu_default_temp_offset: Default temperature offset
>  - samsung,tmu_cal_type: Callibration type
>  
> +** Optional properties:
> +
> +- vtmu-supply: This entry is optional and provides the regulator node supplying
> +		voltage to TMU. If needed this entry can be placed inside
> +		board/platform specific dts file.
> +
>  Example 1):
>  
>  	tmu@100C0000 {
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 

Re: [PATCH 1/3] thermal: exynos: List vtmu-supply as optional property in DT binding

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Eduardo,

On 03/08/2016 06:07 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 03:19:09PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The Exynos Thermal Management Unit binding says that the vtmu-supply
>> is optional but is listed in the required properties section. Add an
>> optional properties section and move the regulator property there.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
>> ---
>>
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 9 ++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
>> index faa62059b5c5..70b4c16c7ed8 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
>> @@ -41,9 +41,6 @@
>>  		for current TMU channel
>>  	-- "tmu_sclk" clock for functional operation of the current TMU
>>  		channel
>> -- vtmu-supply: This entry is optional and provides the regulator node supplying
>> -		voltage to TMU. If needed this entry can be placed inside
>> -		board/platform specific dts file.
>>  
>>  The Exynos TMU supports generating interrupts when reaching given
>>  temperature thresholds. Number of supported thermal trip points depends
> 
> Where is this patch based on? I checked it on my fixes and linus
> branches, also on linux-next 0308 branch, and none of those apply clean.
>

I mentioned in the cover letter [0] that this series were based on top
of in-flight patches from Krzysztof Kozlowski to avoid merge conflicts.

Those have not landed yet either so maybe you could look at those first?
 
> Can you please send this based on upstream kernel?
>

Ok, my intention was to make picking both patch series easier but if
this is inconvenient to you, I can base on top of current mainline
and let you handle the merge conflicts (or ask Krzysztof to resend
on top of my patches).

[0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/18/591
 
Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

Re: [PATCH 1/3] thermal: exynos: List vtmu-supply as optional property in DT binding

[Eduardo Valentin]

On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:30:17PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Eduardo,
> 
> On 03/08/2016 06:07 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 03:19:09PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> The Exynos Thermal Management Unit binding says that the vtmu-supply
> >> is optional but is listed in the required properties section. Add an
> >> optional properties section and move the regulator property there.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 9 ++++++---
> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
> >> index faa62059b5c5..70b4c16c7ed8 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
> >> @@ -41,9 +41,6 @@
> >>  		for current TMU channel
> >>  	-- "tmu_sclk" clock for functional operation of the current TMU
> >>  		channel
> >> -- vtmu-supply: This entry is optional and provides the regulator node supplying
> >> -		voltage to TMU. If needed this entry can be placed inside
> >> -		board/platform specific dts file.
> >>  
> >>  The Exynos TMU supports generating interrupts when reaching given
> >>  temperature thresholds. Number of supported thermal trip points depends
> > 
> > Where is this patch based on? I checked it on my fixes and linus
> > branches, also on linux-next 0308 branch, and none of those apply clean.
> >
> 
> I mentioned in the cover letter [0] that this series were based on top
> of in-flight patches from Krzysztof Kozlowski to avoid merge conflicts.
> 
> Those have not landed yet either so maybe you could look at those first?
>  
> > Can you please send this based on upstream kernel?
> >
> 
> Ok, my intention was to make picking both patch series easier but if
> this is inconvenient to you, I can base on top of current mainline
> and let you handle the merge conflicts (or ask Krzysztof to resend
> on top of my patches).
> 
> [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/18/591

Got it. I am checking his patches first then.

>  
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Javier Martinez Canillas
> Open Source Group
> Samsung Research America