From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Belloni Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rtc: s3c: Document in binding that only s3c6410 needs a src clk Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 23:31:53 +0100 Message-ID: <20160317223153.GI2831@piout.net> References: <1455545466-25709-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> <20160218143853.GF9654@rob-hp-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160218143853.GF9654@rob-hp-laptop> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rob Herring Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Rob, On 18/02/2016 at 08:38:53 -0600, Rob Herring wrote : > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:11:06AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > The S3C binding doc says that the RTC and RTC source clocks are required > > but the S3C driver supports different HW IP and only the s3c6410 needs a > > source clock. > > > > Fix the binding explaining that the source clock is only needed for the > > s3c6410-rtc compatible controller. > > > > Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni > > > > --- > > Hello, > > > > This patch depends on a previous one that was picked by Rob Herring so > > this one has to go through his tree again and not through the RTC tree > > to avoid conflicts. > > Ugg, sent pull request today. It should be in Linus' tree now. > > This can go thru rtc tree if you prefer. Otherwise, I'll queue it up for > 4.6. > Do you plan to send that one to Linus for 4.6? Else, I still have a few patches to send before the end of the merge window. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com