From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bjorn Andersson Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] ARM: dts: apq8064: add gsbi7 i2c support Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 07:34:15 -0700 Message-ID: <20160329143415.GH8929@tuxbot> References: <1458762366-9233-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> <1458762436-9446-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1458762436-9446-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Srinivas Kandagatla Cc: Andy Gross , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed 23 Mar 12:47 PDT 2016, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > This patch adds support to gsbi7 i2c which is used in some of the new > boards. > > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-pins.dtsi | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi | 13 +++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-pins.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-pins.dtsi > index 8bb5e5f..4102a98 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-pins.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-pins.dtsi > @@ -219,4 +219,29 @@ > function = "gsbi7"; > }; > }; > + > + i2c7_pins: i2c7 { > + mux { > + pins = "gpio84", "gpio85"; > + function = "gsbi7"; > + }; > + > + pinconf { > + pins = "gpio84", "gpio85"; > + drive-strength = <16>; > + bias-disable; > + }; > + }; > + > + i2c7_pins_sleep: i2c7_pins_sleep { > + mux { > + pins = "gpio84", "gpio85"; > + function = "gpio"; > + }; > + pinconf { > + pins = "gpio84", "gpio85"; > + drive-strength = <2>; > + bias-disable = <0>; > + }; > + }; I've been going back and forth about having default pinconfig settings in the platform dtsi and having devices to override these later. I do find it cleaner to push this down to the board, as they should always be verified and tweaked by a hw guy for the specific board. For some cases this isn't really the case, based on hard design requirements, but for i2c it is. > }; > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi > index 81b4290..f064f59 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi > @@ -417,6 +417,19 @@ > clock-names = "core", "iface"; > status = "disabled"; > }; > + > + gsbi7_i2c: i2c@16680000 { We normally don't need to reference the i2c adaptors, so please drop this label. > + compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v1.1.1"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&i2c7_pins>; > + pinctrl-1 = <&i2c7_pins_sleep>; > + pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep"; > + reg = <0x16680000 0x1000>; > + interrupts = ; > + clocks = <&gcc GSBI7_QUP_CLK>, > + <&gcc GSBI7_H_CLK>; > + clock-names = "core", "iface"; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; Regards, Bjorn