Re: [PATCH 02/15] ARM: OMAP: Correct interrupt type for ARM TWD

[Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>]

* Jon Hunter <jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> [160329 07:03]:
> Hi Tony,
> 
> On 18/03/16 15:41, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> > On 03/17/2016 04:19 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >> The ARM TWD interrupt is a private peripheral interrupt (PPI) and per
> >> the ARM GIC documentation, whether the type for PPIs can be set is
> >> IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED. For OMAP4 devices the PPI type cannot be set and
> >> so when we attempt to set the type for the ARM TWD interrupt it fails.
> >> This has done unnoticed because it fails silently and because we cannot
> >> re-configure the type it has had no impact. Nevertheless fix the type
> >> for the TWD interrupt so that it matches the hardware configuration.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Tony, Grygorii,
> >> Please note that I have not tested this. Can you test this series and
> >> see if you see any warnings on OMAP4? I am guessing that the configuration
> >> should be LEVEL and not EDGE. This was reported here:
> > 
> > Tested-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
> > 
> > Tested on PandaBoard. Without this patch I can see below warning:
> 
> I think that you can pick up this fix independently of this series as it
> is something that has been broken for sometime and should be fixed. I
> included it here for completeness to highlight the issue but if you want
> to take it now, please go ahead.

OK applying into omap-for-v4.6/fixes thanks.

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html