devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david-xT8FGy+AXnRB3Ne2BGzF6laj5H9X9Tb+@public.gmane.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-compiler-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] checks: Add infrastructure for setting bus type of nodes
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 16:22:47 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160331052247.GD416@voom.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458780021-5052-1-git-send-email-robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4534 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 07:40:19PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> In preparation to support bus specific checks, add the necessary
> infrastructure to determine the bus type for nodes. Initially, PCI and
> simple bus are supported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> David,

Sorry it's taken me a while to look at this.  I've been a mixture of
busy and sick :/

> Hopefully this matches what you had in mind for bus checks.

It's getting there.

> 
> Rob
> 
>  checks.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  dtc.h    | 11 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/checks.c b/checks.c
> index 386f956..48e926e 100644
> --- a/checks.c
> +++ b/checks.c
> @@ -527,6 +527,84 @@ static void fixup_path_references(struct check *c, struct node *dt,
>  ERROR(path_references, NULL, NULL, fixup_path_references, NULL,
>        &duplicate_node_names);
>  
> +static bool is_pci_bridge(struct node *node)
> +{
> +	struct property *prop;
> +
> +	if (!node)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	prop = get_property(node, "device_type");
> +	if (!prop)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (strcmp(prop->val.val, "pci") == 0)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	return false;
> +}

So, I don't love using device_type here, since that's generally
discouraged in modern flat trees, but I don't know of a better way to
detect a pci bridge, so I guess it's ok.  

> +struct bus_type pci_bus_type = {
> +        .expected_addr_cells = 3,
> +        .expected_size_cells = 2,

I'm a bit torn here.  Part of me wants to suggest a 'check_bridge'
function which handles this and can also make more subtle checks, but
then just the expected cells values will handle nearly all real cases
more succinctly.

> +        .is_type = is_pci_bridge,

'is_type' isn't clear whether it's checking a bus bridge or a bus
device, so it needs a rename.  'bridge_is_type' maybe?

> +};
> +
> +static bool is_simple_bridge(struct node *node)
> +{
> +	struct property *prop;
> +	int len = 0;
> +
> +	if (!node)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/* root node is special case defaulting to simple-bus */
> +	if (!node->parent)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	prop = get_property(node, "compatible");
> +	if (!prop)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	do {
> +		const char *str = prop->val.val;
> +
> +		if (strcmp(str, "simple-bus") == 0)
> +			return true;
> +		len += strlen(str) + 1;
> +		str += len;
> +	} while (len < prop->val.len);

Definitely want a helper function in livetree.c to do this check for a
compatible value.

> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +struct bus_type simple_bus_type = {
> +	.expected_addr_cells = -1, /* For don't care */
> +	.expected_size_cells = -1,
> +	.is_type = is_simple_bridge,
> +};
> +
> +struct bus_type *bus_types[] = {
> +	&pci_bus_type,
> +	&simple_bus_type,
> +	NULL
> +};
> +
> +static void fixup_bus_type(struct check *c, struct node *dt,
> +				  struct node *node)
> +{
> +	struct bus_type **bus;
> +
> +	for (bus = bus_types; *bus != NULL; bus++) {
> +		if (!(*bus)->is_type(node))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		node->bus_type = *bus;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +}
> +ERROR(bus_type, NULL, fixup_bus_type, NULL, NULL);
> +
>  /*
>   * Semantic checks
>   */
> @@ -685,6 +763,7 @@ static struct check *check_table[] = {
>  
>  	&explicit_phandles,
>  	&phandle_references, &path_references,
> +	&bus_type,
>  
>  	&address_cells_is_cell, &size_cells_is_cell, &interrupt_cells_is_cell,
>  	&device_type_is_string, &model_is_string, &status_is_string,
> diff --git a/dtc.h b/dtc.h
> index 56212c8..c1a1fe9 100644
> --- a/dtc.h
> +++ b/dtc.h
> @@ -132,6 +132,16 @@ struct label {
>  	struct label *next;
>  };
>  
> +struct check;
> +struct node;
> +
> +struct bus_type {
> +        int expected_addr_cells;
> +        int expected_size_cells;
> +        bool (*is_type)(struct node *node);
> +        void (*check_unit_addr)(struct check *c, struct node *dt, struct node *node);
> +};
> +
>  struct property {
>  	bool deleted;
>  	char *name;
> @@ -158,6 +168,7 @@ struct node {
>  	int addr_cells, size_cells;
>  
>  	struct label *labels;
> +	struct bus_type *bus_type;
>  };
>  
>  #define for_each_label_withdel(l0, l) \

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-31  5:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-24  0:40 [RFC 1/3] checks: Add infrastructure for setting bus type of nodes Rob Herring
     [not found] ` <1458780021-5052-1-git-send-email-robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-24  0:40   ` [RFC 2/3] checks: Add unit-address checks for simple-bus and default Rob Herring
     [not found]     ` <1458780021-5052-2-git-send-email-robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-31  5:29       ` David Gibson
     [not found]         ` <20160331052912.GE416-1s0os16eZneny3qCrzbmXA@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-31 16:18           ` Rob Herring
     [not found]             ` <CAL_JsqJO+9Wna4mjeRLj+ELy7BwL7K=QEVrNGs3CuAaE3Y_Q3A-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-01  2:27               ` David Gibson
     [not found]                 ` <20160401022735.GJ416-1s0os16eZneny3qCrzbmXA@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-01 18:50                   ` Rob Herring
     [not found]                     ` <CAL_JsqLup+esWdQ1dzpOaj17BaE2d2CJ6sJAqBUcNx2xBvNFKg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-04  0:22                       ` David Gibson
2016-03-24  0:40   ` [RFC 3/3] checks: Add unit-address checks for PCI buses Rob Herring
     [not found]     ` <1458780021-5052-3-git-send-email-robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-31  5:32       ` David Gibson
     [not found]         ` <20160331053220.GF416-1s0os16eZneny3qCrzbmXA@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-01 19:52           ` Rob Herring
     [not found]             ` <CAL_JsqK5Ze4P8ofykfebV30TrMzur0cvhZi_RQMkW-kUbsvTpw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-04  1:08               ` David Gibson
2016-03-31  5:22   ` David Gibson [this message]
     [not found]     ` <20160331052247.GD416-1s0os16eZneny3qCrzbmXA@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-31 15:17       ` [RFC 1/3] checks: Add infrastructure for setting bus type of nodes Rob Herring
     [not found]         ` <CAL_JsqKTarcy2UHKD5m2F7TNP3stNnpCdxTrptGeiTXJJHiGaA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-01  2:23           ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160331052247.GD416@voom.redhat.com \
    --to=david-xt8fgy+axnrb3ne2bgzf6laj5h9x9tb+@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-compiler-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).