From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Gross Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bypass BAM init if Remotely controlled Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:21:20 -0500 Message-ID: <20160405212120.GA3873@hector.attlocal.net> References: <1458640151-15150-1-git-send-email-gpramod@codeaurora.org> <56F116AC.2000704@mm-sol.com> <20160405181950.GD8930@vkoul-mobl.iind.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160405181950.GD8930@vkoul-mobl.iind.intel.com> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Vinod Koul Cc: Stanimir Varbanov , Pramod Gurav , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, okaya@codeaurora.org, architt@codeaurora.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:19:50AM -0700, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:56AM +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > > On 03/22/2016 11:49 AM, Pramod Gurav wrote: > > > On some QOCM platforms(eg 8996) BAM control registers are managed remotely > > > hence can not be accessed by application processor for writes. So skip the bam_init > > > for any such platform if DT property is set. > > > > > > Tested on 8996 (BAM Global control is through remote) and DB410C boards. > > > Tested with i2c DMA on these targets which uses BAM as DMA controller. > > > > I have similar patches at [1] already, could you check them first. > > was there an update posted on these? I dont have this series or an update in > my queue No updates that I can see. The original is here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/1/113