From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Baoquan He Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] kexec: arrange for paddr_vmcoreinfo_note() to return phys_addr_t Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 20:56:49 +0800 Message-ID: <20160503125649.GA2656@x1.redhat.com> References: <20160428092644.GX19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20160429151639.GC23726@leverpostej> <20160503042441.GA2518@x1.redhat.com> <20160503101258.GL19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160503101258.GL19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Pratyush Anand , Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Ian Campbell , Tony Luck , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Pawel Moll , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , kexec@lists.infradead.org, Fenghua Yu , Vivek Goyal , Haren Myneni , Rob Herring , Eric Biederman , Santosh Shilimkar , Kumar Gala , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 05/03/16 at 11:12am, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:24:41PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > > Could you please help tell why arm PAE kernel can be put above 4G? > > Since the change is related to common code, I am curious about how > > it's so different with other ARCHs. > > This is explained in the covering email to the series. > > The explanation given by Pratyush was incomplete. Yeah, he said non LPAE also has PHYS_OFFSET later to me. In fact this patch is totally unharmful to other ARCHes, I just can't stand the curiosity. Sorry about this. > > -- > RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up > according to speedtest.net.