From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 13/14] dt-bindings: arm-gic: Add documentation for Tegra210 AGIC Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 18:28:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20160511172823.GC18829@leverpostej> References: <20160427173810.GC7359@leverpostej> <5721C597.1010105@nvidia.com> <20160428095525.GB21145@leverpostej> <572C56A6.7020408@nvidia.com> <573358F9.6000108@nvidia.com> <57335AD3.7070109@nvidia.com> <57336397.4000401@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57336397.4000401-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jon Hunter Cc: Rob Herring , Geert Uytterhoeven , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Marc Zyngier , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Stephen Warren , Thierry Reding , Kevin Hilman , Grygorii Strashko , Lars-Peter Clausen , Linus Walleij , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 05:53:43PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Rob, Mark, > > On 11/05/16 17:30, Rob Herring wrote: > > A platform driver for just gic-400 is wrong IMO until we have platform > > drivers for all interrupt controllers. > > Yes, that is fine with me, but can we decide on whether the platform > driver should match "tegra210-agic" or the early driver should bail-out > if clocks/power-domains are present? > > I am fine with either, but I think that Rob prefers the tegra210-agic > compat string and Mark prefers to bail-out of the early driver if > clocks/power-domains are present. If anything, I wasn't too keen on bailing out becuase of those properties, as I mentioned for the case of a root interrupt controller. I am happy to match the "tegra210-agic" string specifically. Thanks, Mark.