From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC-PATCH 0/2] ASoC: simple_card: support for hw-params rules Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 16:29:04 -0500 Message-ID: <20160523212904.GA6688@rob-hp-laptop> References: <1463747445-14167-1-git-send-email-kernel@martin.sperl.org> <573F6279.8040008@metafoo.de> <20160523165931.GY8206@sirena.org.uk> <20160523171515.GI4976@leverpostej> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160523171515.GI4976@leverpostej> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mark Rutland Cc: Mark Brown , Lars-Peter Clausen , kernel-TqfNSX0MhmxHKSADF0wUEw@public.gmane.org, Pawel Moll , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, alsa-devel-K7yf7f+aM1XWsZ/bQMPhNw@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 06:15:16PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:59:31PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:16:09PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > > > > > How about allowing to embed eBPF bytecode in the DT that can be installed as > > > a constraint set? This would allow maximum for flexibility and also make the > > > implementation a lot easier. > > > > That seems somewhat Linux specific, I'd like to see some DT maintainer > > buy in on that one as well as Takashi's thoughts. > > I am very much not in favour of embedding eBPF bytecode into the DT. +1 What's wrong with Forth? ;) Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html