From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/23] ARM: dts: armadillo800eva: Fix W=1 dtc warnings Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 09:13:09 +0900 Message-ID: <20160524001309.GA2477@verge.net.au> References: <1463728214-13838-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <1463728214-13838-12-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Kuninori Morimoto , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 02:52:20PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Sergei Shtylyov > wrote: > > On 05/20/2016 10:10 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /memory has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name > >> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /regulator@0 has a unit name, but no reg property > >> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /regulator@1 has a unit name, but no reg property > >> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /regulator@2 has a unit name, but no reg property > >> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /regulator@3 has a unit name, but no reg property > >> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /i2c@2 has a unit name, but no reg property > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > >> --- > >> v2: > >> - No changes. > >> --- > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740-armadillo800eva.dts | 12 ++++++------ > >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740-armadillo800eva.dts > >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740-armadillo800eva.dts > >> index 2c82dab2b6f45f9c..b3f0ac4b99bd5a3d 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740-armadillo800eva.dts > >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740-armadillo800eva.dts > > > > [...] > >> > >> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ > >> }; > >> }; > >> > >> - i2c2: i2c@2 { > >> + i2c2: i2c2 { > > > > Not "i2c-2" as in the other patches? > > Oops... Thanks for noticing! > > Simon: Do you want me to repost the whole series once again, or > can you fix this up while applying? I'll just fix it up. No need to repost for this.