From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lothar =?UTF-8?B?V2HDn21hbm4=?= Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] backlight: pwm_bl: disable PWM when 'duty_cycle' is zero Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 07:23:46 +0200 Message-ID: <20160610072346.51b0a5d5@ipc1.ka-ro> References: <1465294429-8570-1-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> <20160609135125.GA2385@dell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160609135125.GA2385@dell> Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Jingoo Han , Thierry Reding , Tomi Valkeinen , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Marcel Ziswiler , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Mark Rutland , Pawel Moll , Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 14:51:25 +0100 Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Lothar Wa=C3=9Fmann wrote: >=20 > > 'brightness' is usually an index into a table of duty_cycle values, > > where the value at index 0 may well be non-zero > > (tegra30-apalis-eval.dts and tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts are real-l= ife > > examples). > > Thus brightness =3D=3D 0 does not necessarily mean that the PWM out= put > > will be inactive. > > Check for 'duty_cycle =3D=3D 0' rather than 'brightness =3D=3D 0' t= o decide > > whether to disable the PWM. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Lothar Wa=C3=9Fmann > > --- > > Changes wrt. v1: > > - update binding docs to reflect the change > >=20 > > .../devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/pwm-backlight.txt |= 9 ++++++--- > > drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c |= 4 ++-- > > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > >=20 > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/pwm-b= acklight.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/pwm-bac= klight.txt > > index 764db86..95fa8a9 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/pwm-backligh= t.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/pwm-backligh= t.txt > > @@ -4,10 +4,13 @@ Required properties: > > - compatible: "pwm-backlight" > > - pwms: OF device-tree PWM specification (see PWM binding[0]) > > - brightness-levels: Array of distinct brightness levels. Typica= lly these > > - are in the range from 0 to 255, but any range starting at 0 = will do. > > + are in the range from 0 to 255, but any range will do. > > The actual brightness level (PWM duty cycle) will be interpo= lated > > - from these values. 0 means a 0% duty cycle (darkest/off), wh= ile the > > - last value in the array represents a 100% duty cycle (bright= est). > > + from these values. 0 means a 0% duty cycle, while the highes= t value in > > + the array represents a 100% duty cycle. > > + The range may be in reverse order (starting with the maximum= duty cycle > > + value) to create a PWM signal with the 100% duty cycle repre= senting > > + minimum and 0% duty cycle maximum brigthness. > > - default-brightness-level: the default brightness level (index = into the > > array defined by the "brightness-levels" property) > > - power-supply: regulator for supply voltage > > diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backl= ight/pwm_bl.c > > index b2b366b..80b2b52 100644 > > --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c > > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c > > @@ -103,8 +103,8 @@ static int pwm_backlight_update_status(struct b= acklight_device *bl) > > if (pb->notify) > > brightness =3D pb->notify(pb->dev, brightness); > > =20 > > - if (brightness > 0) { > > - duty_cycle =3D compute_duty_cycle(pb, brightness); > > + duty_cycle =3D compute_duty_cycle(pb, brightness); > > + if (duty_cycle > 0) { >=20 > How does this work in the aforementioned: >=20 > "The range may be in reverse order" >=20 > ... case? Surely when duty_cycle is when the screen should be at it'= s > brightest? Wouldn't it confuse the user if they turn their brightnes= s > *up* and the screen goes *off*? >=20 Assuming that the PWM output is inactive (LOW) when the duty_cycle is set to zero, there will be no difference between operating the PWM at duty_cycle 0 or disabling it. Currently, the screen will go bright when it should be off in this case. Lothar Wa=C3=9Fmann