Re: [PATCH 5/7] mtd: nand: Add Hynix H27UBG8T2BTR-BC to nand_ids table

Boris Brezillon
2016-06-07T05:49:39Z

On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 22:31:38 +0200
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 22:59:03 +0300
> Aleksei Mamlin <mamlinav@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 20:55:49 +0200
> > Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 13:24:22 +0300
> > > Aleksei Mamlin <mamlinav@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Add the full description of the Hynix H27UBG8T2BTR-BC NAND chip in the
> > > > nand_ids table so that we can later use the NAND ECC infos and ONFI timings
> > > > mode in controller drivers.
> > >
> > > Still hoping to get this series [1] merged in 4.8, but if that's
> > > not the case, I'll apply your patch.
> > >
> > > BTW, that would be great if you could test it on your platforms.
> > >
> >
> > It seems that Hynix-specific initialization code can't handle H27UBG8T2BTR-BC
> > chip:
> >
> > [ 0.886153] nand: Could not find valid ONFI parameter page; aborting
> > [ 0.892665] nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0xad, Chip ID: 0xd7
> > [ 0.899025] nand: Hynix 1c03000.nand
> > [ 0.902596] nand: bus width 8 instead 16 bit
> > [ 0.906858] nand: No NAND device found
> > [ 0.910620] sunxi_nand 1c03000.nand: failed to init nand chips
> > [ 0.916528] sunxi_nand: probe of 1c03000.nand failed with error -22
>
> Can you try this patch? It should fix the problem [1].

Brian, I have a question regarding the extended NAND ids (not full-ids)
defined in the nand_ids table. Are they really valid for all vendors?

If that's the case, why are we extracting the bus width from the id[3]
since we already have this information in the options field?

>
> [1]http://code.bulix.org/6hjww1-100494
>
>

--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering