From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/9] pwm: pwm-tiecap: Update dt binding document to use proper unit address Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:33:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20160711103345.GB5503@ulmo.ba.sec> References: <1462291015-1919-1-git-send-email-fcooper@ti.com> <1462291015-1919-5-git-send-email-fcooper@ti.com> <20160711095623.GI5823@ulmo.ba.sec> <20160711100629.GJ5823@ulmo.ba.sec> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160711100629.GJ5823@ulmo.ba.sec> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Franklin S Cooper Jr Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, paul@pwsan.com, t-kristo@ti.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, vigneshr@ti.com, nsekhar@ti.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:06:29PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:56:23AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:56:50AM -0500, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote: > > > Replace unit address from 0 to the proper physical address. Also insu= re > > > that the unit address matches the reg property address. > > >=20 > > > Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt | 8 ++++---- > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >=20 > > I applied this long ago but never let you know: Applied, thanks. >=20 > Actually I didn't. And it seems the reason is that it doesn't apply > cleanly. For some reason my tree doesn't have an entry for the ecap > example on am437x. Am I missing a patch? Can you resend whatever is > not in linux-next yet? Oh, nevermind my blabbering, it took me too long to realize that this is the series that Tony had picked up for the most part, and I hadn't properly marked it done in patchwork. I'll go get some coffee now. Thierry --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJXg3YJAAoJEN0jrNd/PrOhzdwP/iZmYhqh/Q7NjSWzUse3NL/x K6W5441H1aNOs9T9gE8iTWd3d+wVimySETpZTCg7rFH0BdDrRUx5ZhKbtWOlcem4 L6DpCjhEsPu9ObVw8vBUGaqVkh+GVueV1p6sRlb8F2FdDZtlhBj+mn89xtxDpFKQ /fp4rykEsh5PhalxBg//9Zbk3at4ouVev7jUNfB3Qxl5U0kxiPmkQ/sETNp2sjoX TxqbA23rD0B0YDAsk5iYUognAOLUcOXVqeyaw46r2/j/w35a8wzW/BLlfS0ePl9J Nn2o6xxWm4yEG/5F7+souAa0/65DTERe1nE5OW1UplpVsFFzBHCiH9hjgX2eiRHW BTCcibLN5y/w9r+tJadsE1ppN5SxdmBsFDwTdRj1/FscGJmc6nb59bHTf6HxVRHW fLlgCDu44WEJ1LkrAqrq/PEiI0Il/hpO90IEHGJgF1Jbyc7eJfIluSJBsT2D94C5 faQtqO8ZC/rI01LF9pB3IfB9keb43H7c8u+T5t9gHG6QWY1smN9KNUyEJQ4HU8yz zfMqp7RlQdfFcnJWGLv60wv1pArOUwIYLgIfiMXgo47evWFrwM51QezWQ+iwgntA IPG+o1CeU/PeUub0Cir53su4Rb9J+oJGTMM5kiLicMf5envlFyBY/mfDq9vezBDn 09ar2DQzX2bP1KfWORs5 =Mx4R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD--