From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] clk: sunxi-ng: mux: Add support for mux tables Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 09:40:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20160727074020.GH6560@lukather> References: <1469516671-19377-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> <1469516671-19377-5-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> <20160726194306.9b6aadd3d1669bd6f5a54d99@free.fr> <20160727065934.GD6560@lukather> <20160727091827.e26f72701ce5758fa29aff7a@free.fr> Reply-To: maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="o71xDhNo7p97+qVi" Return-path: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160727091827.e26f72701ce5758fa29aff7a-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Jean-Francois Moine Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, dev-3kdeTeqwOZ9EV1b7eY7vFQ@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-clk-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --o71xDhNo7p97+qVi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 09:18:27AM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 08:59:34 +0200 > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 07:43:06PM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 15:04:26 +0800 > > > Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > > > > > > Some clock muxes have holes, i.e. invalid or unconnected inputs, > > > > between parent mux values. > > > > > > > > Add support for specifying a mux table to map clock parents to > > > > mux values. > > > > > > Putting empty strings in the holes should work. No? > > > Ex: > > > > > > static const char * const csi_mclk_parents[] = > > > { "pll-video0", "pll-video1", "", "", "", "osc24M" }; > > > > Not really. The clock would be declared as orphan, while it's really > > not. > > > > Parenting functions would also not work as expected, > > clk_hw_get_parent_by_index being the obvious example, in that case > > returning the empty string for an invalid parent, while it should > > really return NULL. > > I don't see why the clock should be orphan. > Then, when a parent is "", clk_hw_get_parent_by_index() returns NULL. Why? It should return NULL when there's no parent, while you explicitly registered a parent. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com --o71xDhNo7p97+qVi--