From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: add pwm driver for HiSilicon BVT SOCs Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:43:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20160801124355.GB13179@leverpostej> References: <1470015728-36979-1-git-send-email-yuanjian12@hisilicon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1470015728-36979-1-git-send-email-yuanjian12@hisilicon.com> Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jian Yuan Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, xuejiancheng@hisilicon.com, kevin.lixu@hisilicon.com, jalen.hsu@hisilicon.com, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 09:42:08AM +0800, Jian Yuan wrote: > From: yuanjian > > Add pwm driver for HiSilicon BVT SOCs > > Reviewed-by: Jiancheng Xue > Signed-off-by: Jian Yuan > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-hibvt.txt | 18 ++ > drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 10 + > drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/pwm/pwm-hibvt.c | 272 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 301 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-hibvt.txt > create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-hibvt.c > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-hibvt.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-hibvt.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..4efd83e > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-hibvt.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ > +Hisilicon PWM controller > + > +Required properties: > + - compatible: should be "hisilicon,hibvt-pwm" and one of the following: > + "hisilicon,hi3516cv300-pwm". I take it "hisilicon,hibvt-pwm" is the fallback entry. It would be good to note that explicitly. > + - reg: physical base address and length of the controller's registers. > + - clocks: phandle and clock specifier of the PWM reference clock. > + - resets: offset address and offset bit for reset or unreset of the controller. > + - pwm-nums: pwm number of the controller. This should be 'num-pwms'. I assume this is the number of PWMs exposed by this controller. Is this not probeable, or dicoverable based on the compatible string? How does this vary in practice? > + > +Example: > + pwm: pwm@12130000 { > + compatible = "hisilicon,hibvt-pwm"; This is missing "hisilicon,hi3516cv300-pwm" as per the requirements of the binding. > + reg = <0x12130000 0x10000>; > + clocks = <&crg_ctrl HI3516CV300_PWM_CLK>; > + resets = <&crg_ctrl 0x38 0>; > + pwm-nums = <4>; > + }; Thanks, Mark.