From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: dts: exynos: Remove skeleton.dtsi usage and fix memory node DTC warnings
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:40:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160901114046.GB4220@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11690712.d89FASKYvI@amdc1976>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:59:48AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Thursday, September 01, 2016 10:35:15 AM Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > On 08/31/2016 07:40 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, August 31, 2016 03:45:24 PM Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > >> The idea is to get rid of skeleton.dtsi [0], but that will of course take
> > >> time until the dtsi is removed from all the files. So this patch is a step
> > >> in the right direction so at least Exynos is not a blocker to remove it.
> > >
> > > Krzysztof's point is valid. If you are going to convert all DTS/DTSI
> > > then it is okay to apply Exynos specific changes, otherwise the code
> > > should stay as it is currently.
> > >
> > > Exynos won't be a blocker since we have your patches now and they can
> > > be applied when/if needed ;)..
> >
> > Sorry but I disagree. I see no reasons to need this to be an atomic, rather
> > than incremental change. Deprecated things are usually handled by removing
> > the usage and once there are no users, finally removing them.
>
> Yes, given that there is agreement on the direction and people are aware
> of the needed changes. This doesn't seem to be a case yet as there is
> no comment in skeleton.dtsi about being deprecated and other platforms'
> Maintainers are not aware of the need for the change.
On the DT side we're all agreed that skeleton.dtsi should die. I'll send
a patch adding a note to skeleton.dtsi to make this more obvious, but
that shouldn't be a blocker for removing existing uses.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-01 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-31 12:14 [PATCH 0/7] ARM: dts: exynos: Remove skeleton.dtsi usage and fix memory node DTC warnings Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-08-31 12:14 ` [PATCH 1/7] ARM: dts: exynos: Add missing memory node for Exynos5440 boards Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-08-31 17:22 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-09-01 8:30 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-08-31 17:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-09-01 8:43 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-09-01 9:05 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
[not found] ` <e3cdab3d-f1ef-f751-b169-e3328178b835-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-09-01 9:19 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
[not found] ` <0e8e0b3c-0dd9-c44b-d1ad-03c840d3a725-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org>
2016-09-01 9:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-09-01 9:36 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
[not found] ` <184ad5f6-5528-2ad7-7c2b-46beda9b6dc9-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org>
2016-09-01 9:48 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-08-31 12:14 ` [PATCH 2/7] ARM: dts: exynos: Remove skeleton.dtsi usage for Exynos3 Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-08-31 12:14 ` [PATCH 3/7] ARM: dts: exynos: Remove skeleton.dtsi usage for Exynos4 Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-08-31 12:14 ` [PATCH 4/7] ARM: dts: exynos: Remove skeleton.dtsi usage for Exynos5 Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-08-31 12:14 ` [PATCH 5/7] ARM: dts: exynos: Add missing unit name to memory nodes in Exynos3 DTS Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-08-31 12:14 ` [PATCH 7/7] ARM: dts: exynos: Add missing unit name to memory nodes in Exynos5 DTS Javier Martinez Canillas
[not found] ` <1472645679-5696-1-git-send-email-javier-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-31 12:14 ` [PATCH 6/7] ARM: dts: exynos: Add missing unit name to memory nodes in Exynos4 DTS Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-08-31 12:55 ` [PATCH 0/7] ARM: dts: exynos: Remove skeleton.dtsi usage and fix memory node DTC warnings Krzysztof Kozlowski
[not found] ` <5366f8a4-b4fb-ec2d-eb1e-5534f24c4a07-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-31 13:45 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
[not found] ` <0da13ae1-90a8-912b-227e-0e94439953d5-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-31 17:40 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-09-01 8:35 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-09-01 9:59 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-09-01 11:40 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-09-01 11:59 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-08-31 17:47 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160901114046.GB4220@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=javier@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).