From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] of: Add generic handling for ePAPR 1.1 fail-sss states Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 09:49:55 -0400 Message-ID: <20160912134955.GE13192@bill-the-cat> References: <20160829223542.18871-1-tony@atomide.com> <57C74306.9020901@gmail.com> <20160831214151.wzq7y54xxs2qj422@atomide.com> <57D1B668.3070001@gmail.com> <20160909141055.GZ4990@bill-the-cat> <20160912133510.GC13192@bill-the-cat> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Matthijs van Duin Cc: Rob Herring , Nishanth Menon , Frank Rowand , Tony Lindgren , Grant Likely , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , linux-omap , Tero Kristo List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 03:46:23PM +0200, Matthijs van Duin wrote: > On 12 September 2016 at 15:35, Tom Rini wrote: > > What do you mean by "you can't put it to good use" ? Is that the case > > of stuff that's say exposed via a header and could be used but isn't (ie > > the cape/hat/chip/etc case) or the IP block is still OK but just not > > exposed at all? > > > > What we're trying to address here is the case of "don't even try to > > use the peripheral, bad things will happen. But please properly idle > > the IP block!". > > I'm pretty sure IP blocks in the "don't even try" category are > necessarily idled. There's no reason they wouldn't be. OK. But this is specifically about the blocks that we are being told by the vendor are _not_ idled and need to be. -- Tom -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html