From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] STM32F4 Add RTC & QSPI clocks Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:29:04 -0700 Message-ID: <20161019202904.GB8871@codeaurora.org> References: <1476436699-21879-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <20161018235108.GP8871@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Gabriel Fernandez Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Michael Turquette , Nicolas Pitre , Arnd Bergmann , daniel.thompson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-clk-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, ludovic.barre-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org, olivier.bideau-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org, amelie.delaunay-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 10/19, Gabriel Fernandez wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > > On 10/19/2016 01:51 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >On 10/14, gabriel.fernandez-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org wrote: > >>Gabriel Fernandez (6): > >> clk: stm32f4: Add LSI & LSE clocks > >> ARM: dts: stm32f429: add LSI and LSE clocks > >> arm: stmf32: Enable SYSCON > >> clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock > >> clk: stm32f469: Add QSPI clock > >> ARM: dts: stm32f429: Add QSPI clock > >Can the clk patches be picked without causing problems for > >existing dt changes? Do you want an ack from clk maintainers > >instead of us picking the clk patches up? The series has > >intermingled clk and dts changes so I'm confused. > > > > Thanks for reviewing. > > Normally DT patches will be taken by STM32 maintainer, but yes there > is a dependency between patch 1 & 2, so if you push the patch 1 into > clk-next tree you have to take also patch 2. Let's break the dependency by making the required property optional or key off a different compatible string. As it stands right now applying patch 1 will cause things to break until the second patch lands which is not great. > > You have to be synchronized with Alexandre Torgue. > > I'd prefer zero synchronization. Please just send the clk patches the next time and leave the stuff for arm-soc out of the patch series. Thanks. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html