From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 REPOST 0/9] CPUs capacity information for heterogeneous systems Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:22:46 +0000 Message-ID: <20161030142246.od5skjzegyp62hma@localhost> References: <20161017154650.18779-1-juri.lelli@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161017154650.18779-1-juri.lelli@arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Juri Lelli Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 04:46:41PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote: > I'm thus now assuming that everybody is OK with the patches and that they can > be queued for 4.10 (we certainly need this plumbing at this point). Please > speak if my assumption is wrong (and provide feedback! :). > Otherwise I'm going to: > > - use Russell's patching system for patches 2 and 8 > - ask Sudeep to pull patches 3,5,6 and 7 > - ask Catalin/Will to pull patches 1,4 and 9 I'm happy to queue patches 1, 4 and 9 for 4.10 (though it might have been easier for the whole series to go through arm-soc). > Do you think we might get into trouble splitting the merge process this way? Probably not. The only minor downside is that I have to grab a new DT for Juno from Sudeep to test the patches. Not an issue, though. -- Catalin