From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] ARM: dts: exynos: replace to "max-frequecy" instead of "clock-freq-min-max" Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 20:41:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20161103184112.GB11071@kozik-lap> References: <20161103062135.10697-1-jh80.chung@samsung.com> <20161103062135.10697-11-jh80.chung@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161103062135.10697-11-jh80.chung@samsung.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jaehoon Chung Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzk@kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:21:32PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > In drivers/mmc/core/host.c, there is "max-frequency" property. > It should be same behavior. So Use the "max-frequency" instead of > "clock-freq-min-max". > > Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5-eval.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-monk.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-rinato.dts | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) This looks totally independent to rest of patches so it can be applied separately without any functional impact (except lack of minimum frequency). Is that correct? Best regards, Krzysztof