Re: [PATCH 10/13] ARM: dts: exynos: replace to "max-frequecy" instead of "clock-freq-min-max"

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 12:19:49PM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon,
> 
> Am Freitag, 4. November 2016, 19:21:30 CET schrieb Jaehoon Chung:
> > On 11/04/2016 03:41 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:21:32PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> > >> In drivers/mmc/core/host.c, there is "max-frequency" property.
> > >> It should be same behavior. So Use the "max-frequency" instead of
> > >> "clock-freq-min-max".
> > >> 
> > >> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> > >> ---
> > >> 
> > >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5-eval.dts | 2 +-
> > >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5.dtsi     | 2 +-
> > >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-monk.dts        | 2 +-
> > >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-rinato.dts      | 2 +-
> > >>  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > This looks totally independent to rest of patches so it can be applied
> > > separately without any functional impact (except lack of minimum
> > > frequency). Is that correct?
> > 
> > You're right. I will split the patches. And will resend.
> > Thanks!
> 
> I think what Krzysztof was asking was just if he can simply pick up this patch 
> alone, as it does not require any of the previous changes.
> 
> Same is true for the Rockchip patches I guess, so we could just take them 
> individually into samsung/rockchip dts branches.

Yes, I wanted to get exactly this information. I couldn't find it in
cover letter.

Best regards,
Krzysztof