devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Anurup M <anurupvasu@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, corbet@lwn.net,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	f.fainelli@gmail.com, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk,
	krzk@kernel.org, anurup.m@huawei.com, zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com,
	tanxiaojun@huawei.com, xuwei5@hisilicon.com,
	sanil.kumar@hisilicon.com, john.garry@huawei.com,
	gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com, shiju.jose@huawei.com,
	wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, guohanjun@huawei.com,
	shyju.pv@huawei.com, linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 07/11] perf: hisi: Add support for Hisilicon SoC event counters
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:10:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161110191058.GE10137@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1478151727-20250-8-git-send-email-anurup.m@huawei.com>

On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 01:42:03AM -0400, Anurup M wrote:
> +	do {
> +		/* Get count from individual L3C banks and sum them up */
> +		for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
> +			total_raw_count += hisi_read_l3c_counter(l3c_hwmod_data,
> +									idx, i);
> +		}
> +		prev_raw_count = local64_read(&hwc->prev_count);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * As prev_raw_count is updated with average value of
> +		 * L3 cache banks, we multiply it by no of banks and
> +		 * compute the delta
> +		 */
> +		delta = (total_raw_count - (prev_raw_count * num_banks)) &
> +								HISI_MAX_PERIOD;
> +
> +		local64_add(delta, &event->count);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Divide by num of banks to get average count and
> +		 * update prev_count with this value
> +		 */
> +		avg_raw_count = total_raw_count / num_banks;
> +	} while (local64_cmpxchg(
> +			 &hwc->prev_count, prev_raw_count, avg_raw_count) !=
> +							 prev_raw_count);

Please don't aggregate like this; expose separate PMUs instead.

This is racy, and by averaging and multiplying we're making up and/or
throwing away data.

[...]

> +	event_value = (val -
> +			HISI_HWEVENT_L3C_READ_ALLOCATE);
> +
> +	/* Select the appropriate Event select register */
> +	if (idx > 3)
> +		reg_offset += 4;
> +
> +	/* Value to write to event type register */
> +	val = event_value << (8 * idx);
> +

Please add helpers for these, and explain *why* the transformations are
necessary.

> +	/* Find the djtag Identifier of the Unit */
> +	client = l3c_hwmod_data->client;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Set the event in L3C_EVENT_TYPEx Register
> +	 * for all L3C banks
> +	 */

As above, it seems like you should expose a separate PMU per bank
instead. That applies for all the other instances where you iterate over
banks.

[...]

> +	for (i = 0; i < l3c_hwmod_data->l3c_hwcfg.num_banks; i++) {
> +		module_id = l3c_hwmod_data->l3c_hwcfg.module_id[i];
> +		cfg_en = l3c_hwmod_data->l3c_hwcfg.bank_cfgen[i];
> +		ret = hisi_djtag_writereg(module_id,
> +					cfg_en,
> +					reg_offset,
> +					value,
> +					client);
> +		if (!ret)
> +			ret = value;
> +	}

This is impossible to read. Please factor this into helpers such that
you don't need this amount of indentation.

Please do similarly elsewhere when you see this indentation pattern.

[...]

> +static int hisi_l3c_get_event_idx(struct hisi_pmu *pl3c_pmu)
> +{
> +	struct hisi_l3c_data *l3c_hwmod_data = pl3c_pmu->hwmod_data;
> +	int event_idx;
> +
> +	event_idx =
> +		find_first_zero_bit(
> +			l3c_hwmod_data->hisi_l3c_event_used_mask,
> +					 pl3c_pmu->num_counters);
> +
> +	if (event_idx == HISI_MAX_CFG_L3C_CNTR)
> +		return -EAGAIN;
> +
> +	__set_bit(event_idx,
> +		l3c_hwmod_data->hisi_l3c_event_used_mask);
> +
> +	return event_idx;
> +}

Please get rid of the weird hungarian notation (i.e. don't use 'p' as a
prefix for pointers), and use temporary variables consistently, e.g.

static int hisi_l3c_get_event_idx(struct hisi_pmu *l3c_pmu)
{
	struct hisi_l3c_data *l3c_hwmod_data = l3c_pmu->hwmod_data;
	unsigned long *used_mask = l3c_hwmod_data->hisi_l3c_event_used_mask;
	int num_counters = pl3c_pmu->num_counters
	int idx;

	idx = find_first_zero_bit(used_mask, num_counters);
	if (idx == num_counters)
		return -EAGAIN;

	set_bit(idx, used_mask);

	return idx;
}

[...]

> +	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "counter-reg",
> +				     &pl3c_hwcfg->counter_reg0_off)) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "DT:Couldnot read counter-reg!\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

Please use spaces in these messages.

Otherwise, my comments on the binding apply here.

[...]

> +static int init_hisi_l3c_data(struct device *dev,
> +					struct hisi_pmu *pl3c_pmu,
> +					struct hisi_djtag_client *client)
> +{
> +	struct hisi_l3c_data *l3c_hwmod_data = NULL;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	l3c_hwmod_data = kzalloc(sizeof(struct hisi_l3c_data),
> +							GFP_KERNEL);

Use:

	l3c_hwmod_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*l3c_hwmod_data, GFP_KERNEL):

[...]

> +static int hisi_pmu_l3c_dev_probe(struct hisi_djtag_client *client)
> +{
> +	struct hisi_pmu *pl3c_pmu = NULL;
> +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	pl3c_pmu = hisi_pmu_alloc(dev);
> +	if (IS_ERR(pl3c_pmu))
> +		return PTR_ERR(pl3c_pmu);

Why use error pointers for this?

hisi_pmu_alloc() only ever returns ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) if it failed to
allocate.

It's far simpler to have it pass on NULL there, and here do:

	pl3c_pmu = hisi_pmu_alloc(dev);
	if (!pl3c_pmu)
		return -ENOMEM;

Please also s/pl3c_pmu/l3c_pmu/ here, and elsewhere throughout the
driver. The 'p' only serves to make this harder to read.

[...]

> +	/* Register with perf PMU */
> +	pl3c_pmu->pmu = (struct pmu) {
> +		.name = pl3c_pmu->name,
> +		.task_ctx_nr = perf_invalid_context,
> +		.event_init = hisi_uncore_pmu_event_init,
> +		.add = hisi_uncore_pmu_add,
> +		.del = hisi_uncore_pmu_del,
> +		.start = hisi_uncore_pmu_start,
> +		.stop = hisi_uncore_pmu_stop,
> +		.read = hisi_uncore_pmu_read,
> +	};

Please remove the comment above this.

[...]

> +int hisi_uncore_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> +	int err;
> +	struct hisi_pmu *phisi_pmu = to_hisi_pmu(event->pmu);

This is undefined behaviour. This must be done *after* we check the
event->pmu->type.

> +
> +	if (event->attr.type != event->pmu->type)
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +
> +	/* we do not support sampling as the counters are all
> +	 * shared by all CPU cores in a CPU die(SCCL). Also we
> +	 * donot support attach to a task(per-process mode)
> +	 */
> +	if (is_sampling_event(event) || event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	/* counters do not have these bits */
> +	if (event->attr.exclude_user	||
> +	    event->attr.exclude_kernel	||
> +	    event->attr.exclude_host	||
> +	    event->attr.exclude_guest	||
> +	    event->attr.exclude_hv	||
> +	    event->attr.exclude_idle)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (event->cpu < 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	event->cpu = cpumask_first(&phisi_pmu->cpu);

You should also check the event grouping.

Take a look at what we do in arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0-pmu.c.

[...]

> +/*
> + * Enable counter and set the counter to count
> + * the event that we're interested in.
> + */
> +void hisi_uncore_pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> +	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> +	struct hisi_pmu *phisi_pmu = to_hisi_pmu(event->pmu);
> +
> +	/* Disable the hardware event counting */
> +	if (phisi_pmu->ops->disable_counter)
> +		phisi_pmu->ops->disable_counter(phisi_pmu, GET_CNTR_IDX(hwc));

Why isn't the counter already disabled?

> +	/*
> +	 * Set event (if destined for Hisilicon SoC counters).
> +	 */
> +	if (phisi_pmu->ops->set_evtype)
> +		phisi_pmu->ops->set_evtype(phisi_pmu, GET_CNTR_IDX(hwc),
> +							hwc->config_base);

Why isn't this done in the pmu::event_add callback?

> +
> +	/* Enable the hardware event counting */
> +	if (phisi_pmu->ops->enable_counter)
> +		phisi_pmu->ops->enable_counter(phisi_pmu, GET_CNTR_IDX(hwc));

This should be the only necessary part of this function.

> +}
> +
> +void hisi_pmu_set_event_period(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> +	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> +	struct hisi_pmu *phisi_pmu = to_hisi_pmu(event->pmu);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The Hisilicon PMU counters have a period of 2^32. To account for the
> +	 * possiblity of extreme interrupt latency we program for a period of
> +	 * half that. Hopefully we can handle the interrupt before another 2^31
> +	 * events occur and the counter overtakes its previous value.
> +	 */
> +	u64 val = 1ULL << 31;
> +
> +	local64_set(&hwc->prev_count, val);
> +
> +	/* Write to the hardware event counter */
> +	phisi_pmu->ops->write_counter(phisi_pmu, hwc, val);
> +}
> +
> +void hisi_uncore_pmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
> +{
> +	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> +	struct hisi_pmu *phisi_pmu = to_hisi_pmu(event->pmu);
> +	struct hisi_pmu_hw_events *hw_events;
> +
> +	hw_events = &phisi_pmu->hw_events;
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(hwc->state & PERF_HES_STOPPED)))
> +		return;
> +
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!(hwc->state & PERF_HES_UPTODATE));
> +	hwc->state = 0;
> +
> +	if (phisi_pmu->ops->set_event_period)
> +		phisi_pmu->ops->set_event_period(event);

When will this differ from hisi_pmu_set_event_period() above?

> +	if (flags & PERF_EF_RELOAD) {
> +		u64 prev_raw_count =  local64_read(&hwc->prev_count);
> +
> +		phisi_pmu->ops->write_counter(phisi_pmu, hwc,
> +						(u32)prev_raw_count);
> +	}

If we always go through hisi_pmu_set_event_period(), this looks
redundant.

> +
> +	hisi_uncore_pmu_enable_event(event);

There's no matching disable_event() call in this function, so this looks
suspicious.

> +	perf_event_update_userpage(event);
> +}
> +
> +void hisi_uncore_pmu_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
> +{
> +	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> +	struct hisi_pmu *phisi_pmu = to_hisi_pmu(event->pmu);
> +
> +	if (hwc->state & PERF_HES_UPTODATE)
> +		return;

Why?

[...]

> +int hisi_uncore_common_fwprop_read(struct device *dev,
> +					struct hisi_pmu *phisi_pmu)
> +{
> +	if (device_property_read_u32(dev, "num-events",
> +					&phisi_pmu->num_events)) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Cant read num-events from DT!\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

For consistency with the rest of the driver, and given there is no ACPI
support, please use the of_property_* API here.

Thanks,
Mark.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-10 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-03  5:41 [RESEND PATCH v1 00/11] perf: arm64: Support for Hisilicon SoC Hardware event counters Anurup M
     [not found] ` <1478151727-20250-1-git-send-email-anurup.m-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-03  5:41   ` [RESEND PATCH v1 01/11] arm64: MAINTAINERS: hisi: Add hisilicon SoC PMU support Anurup M
2016-11-03  5:41   ` [RESEND PATCH v1 02/11] dt-bindings: hisi: Add Hisilicon HiP05/06/07 Sysctrl and Djtag dts bindings Anurup M
2016-11-10 17:23     ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-11 11:19       ` Anurup M
2016-11-11 11:53         ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-11 11:59           ` Anurup M
2016-11-03  5:42   ` [RESEND PATCH v1 08/11] perf: hisi: Add sysfs attributes for L3 cache(L3C) PMU Anurup M
2016-11-03  5:42   ` [RESEND PATCH v1 10/11] perf: hisi: Support for Hisilicon DDRC PMU Anurup M
2016-11-03  5:41 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 03/11] drivers: soc: hisi: Add support for Hisilicon Djtag driver Anurup M
     [not found]   ` <1478151727-20250-4-git-send-email-anurup.m-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-10 17:55     ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-15 10:15       ` Anurup M
2016-11-03  5:42 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 04/11] Documentation: perf: hisi: Documentation for HIP05/06/07 PMU event counting Anurup M
2016-11-03  5:42 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 05/11] dt-bindings: perf: hisi: Add Devicetree bindings for Hisilicon SoC PMU Anurup M
2016-11-03 18:26   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-11-04  5:06     ` Anurup M
2016-11-10 18:30   ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-14  0:06     ` Anurup M
2016-11-15  9:51       ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-16  5:54         ` Anurup M
2016-11-03  5:42 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 06/11] perf: hisi: Update Kconfig for Hisilicon PMU support Anurup M
2016-11-03  5:42 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 07/11] perf: hisi: Add support for Hisilicon SoC event counters Anurup M
2016-11-10 19:10   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-11-14  8:11     ` Anurup M
2016-11-03  5:42 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 09/11] perf: hisi: Miscellanous node(MN) event counting in perf Anurup M
2016-11-03  5:42 ` [RESEND PATCH v1 11/11] dts: arm64: hip06: Add Hisilicon SoC PMU support Anurup M

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161110191058.GE10137@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=anurup.m@huawei.com \
    --cc=anurupvasu@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sanil.kumar@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
    --cc=shyju.pv@huawei.com \
    --cc=tanxiaojun@huawei.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=xuwei5@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).