devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC i2c/for-next] i2c: rcar: Add per-Generation fallback bindings
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:32:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161201153208.GA2389@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480605494-32460-1-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au>

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:18:14PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> In the case of Renesas R-Car hardware we know that there are generations of
> SoCs, e.g. Gen 2 and Gen 3. But beyond that its not clear what the
> relationship between IP blocks might be. For example, I believe that
> r8a7790 is older than r8a7791 but that doesn't imply that the latter is a
> descendant of the former or vice versa.
> 
> We can, however, by examining the documentation and behaviour of the
> hardware at run-time observe that the current driver implementation appears
> to be compatible with the IP blocks on SoCs within a given generation.
> 
> For the above reasons and convenience when enabling new SoCs a
> per-generation fallback compatibility string scheme being adopted for
> drivers for Renesas SoCs.
> 
> Also deprecate renesas,i2c-rcar. It seems poorly named as it is only
> compatible with R-Car Gen 1. It also appears unused in mainline.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>

Sorry, I seem to have omitted the driver (C code) portion of this change.
I send v2.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-12-01 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-01 15:18 [PATCH/RFC i2c/for-next] i2c: rcar: Add per-Generation fallback bindings Simon Horman
2016-12-01 15:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-12-01 15:32 ` Simon Horman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161201153208.GA2389@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).