From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ASoC: simple-card-utils: enable clocks/clock-names/clock-ranges Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 14:09:01 -0800 Message-ID: <20161208220901.GN5423@codeaurora.org> References: <874m2jvtmw.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87zikbuezr.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zikbuezr.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kuninori Morimoto Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Rob Herring , Linux-ALSA , Linux-DT , Michael Turquette , Linux-Kernel , Mark Brown , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Linux-ARM List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 12/05, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > From: Kuninori Morimoto > > Current simple-card is supporting this style for clocks > > sound { > ... > simple-audio-card,cpu { > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > clocks = <&cpu_clock>; > }; > simple-audio-card,codec { > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > clocks = <&codec_clock>; > }; > }; > > Now, it can support this style too, because we can use > devm_get_clk_from_child() now. > > sound { > ... > clocks = <&cpu_clock>, <&codec_clock>; > clock-names = "cpu", "codec"; > clock-ranges; > ... > simple-audio-card,cpu { > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > }; > simple-audio-card,codec { > sound-dai = <&xxx>; > }; > }; > > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto I don't see any reason why we need this patch though. The binding works as is, so supporting different styles doesn't seem like a good idea to me. Let's just keep what we have? Even if a sub-node like cpu or codec gets more than one element in the clocks list property, we can make that work by passing a clock-name then based on some sort of other knowledge. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project