From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>,
Arjun K V <arjun.kv@samsung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Andreas Faerber <afaerber@suse.de>,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>,
Ben Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alim <alim.akhtar@s>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add missing CPU frequencies for Exynos5422/5800
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 09:37:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161216073720.GA3489@kozik-lap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=W6R8cNuR+gTnNRF6d-TNgzUeYTwuCp27efoMsd0YOH3g@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:52:58PM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > [ I added Arjun to Cc:, maybe he can help in explaining this issue
> > (unfortunately Inderpal's email is no longer working). ]
> >
> > Please also note that on Exynos5422/5800 SoCs the same ARM rail
> > voltage is used for 1.9 GHz & 2.0 GHz OPPs as for the 1.8 GHz one.
> > IOW if the problem exists it is already present in the mainline
> > kernel.
>
> Interesting. In the ChromeOS tree I see significantly higher voltages
> needed... Note that one might naively look at
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.8/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5420-cpufreq.c#178>.
>
> 1362500, /* L0 2100 */
> 1312500, /* L1 2000 */
>
> ..but, amazingly enough those voltages aren't used at all. Surprise!
>
> I believe that the above numbers are actually not used and the ASV
> numbers are used instead. See
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.8/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/asv-exynos542x.h#452>
>
> { 2100000,
> 1350000, 1350000, 1350000, 1350000, 1350000,
> 1337500, 1325000, 1312500, 1300000, 1287500,
> 1275000, 1262500, 1250000, 1237500 },
>
> I believe that interpretation there is: some bins of the CPU can run
> at 2.1 GHz just fine at 1.25 V but others need up to 1.35V.
That is definitely the case. One could just look at vendors ASV table
(for 1.9 GHz):
{ 1900000, 1300000, 1287500, 1262500, 1237500, 1225000, 1212500,
1200000, 1187500, 1175000, 1162500, 1150000,
1137500, 1125000, 1112500, 1112500},
The theoretical difference is up to 1.875V! From my experiments I saw
BIN1 chips which should be the same... but some working on 1.2V, some on
1.225V (@1.9 GHz). I didn't see any requiring higher voltages but that
does not mean that there aren't such...
> ...so if you're running at 2.1 GHz at 1.25V then perhaps you're just
> running on a CPU from a nice bin?
Would be nice to see a dump of PKG_ID and AUX_INFO chipid registers
along with name of tested board. Because the "Tested on XU3" is not
sufficient.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-16 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-13 16:52 [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add missing CPU frequencies for Exynos5422/5800 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-12-13 19:18 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-14 13:28 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-12-14 14:06 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-14 14:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-12-14 14:40 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-14 16:10 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-12-14 17:19 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-16 0:52 ` Doug Anderson
2016-12-16 7:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2016-12-16 9:08 ` Markus Reichl
[not found] ` <1b6e8d3a-ec7a-db5d-dd0e-ef9d1480f80a-SRyzfwRm/0rPTwkrwQOX7A@public.gmane.org>
2016-12-16 16:22 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-19 9:14 ` Markus Reichl
2016-12-17 7:31 ` Anand Moon
2016-12-19 13:35 ` Alim Akhtar
2016-12-14 18:20 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161216073720.GA3489@kozik-lap \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=alim.akhtar@s \
--cc=arjun.kv@samsung.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=ben@smart-cactus.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=javier@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).