devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>,
	Arjun K V <arjun.kv@samsung.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Andreas Faerber <afaerber@suse.de>,
	Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>,
	Ben Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alim <alim.akhtar@s>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add missing CPU frequencies for Exynos5422/5800
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 09:37:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161216073720.GA3489@kozik-lap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=W6R8cNuR+gTnNRF6d-TNgzUeYTwuCp27efoMsd0YOH3g@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:52:58PM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > [ I added Arjun to Cc:, maybe he can help in explaining this issue
> >   (unfortunately Inderpal's email is no longer working). ]
> >
> > Please also note that on Exynos5422/5800 SoCs the same ARM rail
> > voltage is used for 1.9 GHz & 2.0 GHz OPPs as for the 1.8 GHz one.
> > IOW if the problem exists it is already present in the mainline
> > kernel.
> 
> Interesting.  In the ChromeOS tree I see significantly higher voltages
> needed...  Note that one might naively look at
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.8/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5420-cpufreq.c#178>.
> 
> 1362500, /* L0  2100 */
> 1312500, /* L1  2000 */
> 
> ..but, amazingly enough those voltages aren't used at all.  Surprise!
> 
> I believe that the above numbers are actually not used and the ASV
> numbers are used instead.  See
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.8/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/asv-exynos542x.h#452>
> 
> { 2100000,
> 1350000, 1350000, 1350000, 1350000, 1350000,
> 1337500, 1325000, 1312500, 1300000, 1287500,
> 1275000, 1262500, 1250000, 1237500 },
> 
> I believe that interpretation there is: some bins of the CPU can run
> at 2.1 GHz just fine at 1.25 V but others need up to 1.35V.

That is definitely the case. One could just look at vendors ASV table
(for 1.9 GHz):
{ 1900000, 1300000, 1287500, 1262500, 1237500, 1225000, 1212500,
                    1200000, 1187500, 1175000, 1162500, 1150000,
		             1137500, 1125000, 1112500, 1112500},

The theoretical difference is up to 1.875V! From my experiments I saw
BIN1 chips which should be the same... but some working on 1.2V, some on
1.225V (@1.9 GHz). I didn't see any requiring higher voltages but that
does not mean that there aren't such...

> ...so if you're running at 2.1 GHz at 1.25V then perhaps you're just
> running on a CPU from a nice bin?

Would be nice to see a dump of PKG_ID and AUX_INFO chipid registers
along with name of tested board. Because the "Tested on XU3" is not
sufficient.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-16  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-13 16:52 [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add missing CPU frequencies for Exynos5422/5800 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-12-13 19:18 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-14 13:28   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-12-14 14:06     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-14 14:25       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-12-14 14:40         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-14 16:10           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-12-14 17:19             ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-16  0:52     ` Doug Anderson
2016-12-16  7:37       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2016-12-16  9:08         ` Markus Reichl
     [not found]           ` <1b6e8d3a-ec7a-db5d-dd0e-ef9d1480f80a-SRyzfwRm/0rPTwkrwQOX7A@public.gmane.org>
2016-12-16 16:22             ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-12-19  9:14               ` Markus Reichl
2016-12-17  7:31           ` Anand Moon
2016-12-19 13:35         ` Alim Akhtar
2016-12-14 18:20   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161216073720.GA3489@kozik-lap \
    --to=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@s \
    --cc=arjun.kv@samsung.com \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=ben@smart-cactus.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=javier@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=kgene@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).