From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Allow mv88e6xxx_smi_init() to
 be used at address 0x1
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 15:38:48 +0100
Message-ID: <20161219143848.GA10048@lunn.ch>
References: <20161219141610.30934-1-romain.perier@free-electrons.com>
 <20161219141610.30934-2-romain.perier@free-electrons.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161219141610.30934-2-romain.perier@free-electrons.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Romain Perier <romain.perier@free-electrons.com>, Volodymyr Bendiuga <volodymyr.bendiuga@gmail.com>
Cc: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>, Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>, Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 03:16:06PM +0100, Romain Perier wrote:
> Currently, the function mv88e6xxx_smi_init() returns -EINVAL if the bit
> zero of sw_addr is 0x1. However, on some platforms, ethernet switches
> are configured in Multi chip addressing mode and available at MDIO
> address 0x1.

Hi Romain

What branch is this against? net-next?

Please see:

https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg409156.html

It would be nicer to use Volodymyr, since it has been reviewed. 

Volodymyr, what happened to your version 2? Did David accept it?

	   Andrew