From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] Fix integration of eee-broken-modes Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:51:20 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20161220.135120.552249230607699619.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1482159938-13239-1-git-send-email-jbrunet@baylibre.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1482159938-13239-1-git-send-email-jbrunet@baylibre.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: jbrunet@baylibre.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, carlo@caione.org, khilman@baylibre.com, martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com, neolynx@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch, narmstrong@baylibre.com, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, julia.lawall@lip6.fr, yegorslists@googlemail.com, afaerber@suse.de List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org From: Jerome Brunet Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:05:35 +0100 > The purpose of this series is to fix the integration of the ethernet phy > property "eee-broken-modes" [0] > > The v3 of this series has been merged, missing a fix (error reported by > kbuild robot) available in the v4 [1] > > More importantly, Florian opposed adding a DT property mapping a device > register this directly [2]. The concern was that the property could be > abused to implement platform configuration policy. After discussing it, > I think we agreed that such information about the HW (defect) should appear > in the platform DT. However, the preferred way is to add a boolean property > for each EEE broken mode. > > [0]: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480326409-25419-1-git-send-email-jbrunet@baylibre.com > [1]: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1480348229-25672-1-git-send-email-jbrunet@baylibre.com > [2]: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e14a3b0c-dc34-be14-48b3-518a0ad0c080@gmail.com Series applied, thank you.