From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [3/5] pinctrl: core: Add generic pinctrl functions for managing groups Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 09:08:50 -0800 Message-ID: <20170102170850.GC9325@atomide.com> References: <20161227172003.6517-4-tony@atomide.com> <20170102162103.xp5ekyyc6dwpeh4j@t450s.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170102162103.xp5ekyyc6dwpeh4j@t450s.lan> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Gary Bisson Cc: Linus Walleij , Haojian Zhuang , Masahiro Yamada , Grygorii Strashko , Nishanth Menon , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org * Gary Bisson [170102 08:21]: > Hi Tony, > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 09:20:01AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > We can add generic helpers for function handling for cases where the pin > > controller driver does not need to use static arrays. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren > > Shouldn't the patch title be: > pinctrl: core: Add generic pinmux functions for managing functions > > It looks like a copy/paste issue since both patches have the same title: > 824bef17d16c pinctrl: core: Add generic pinctrl functions for managing > groups > d70a0fb14682 pinctrl: core: Add generic pinctrl functions for managing > groups Oops, oh well.. At least the description is correct. > That's actually my only remark, I had another comment about freeing the > trees but it is actually done in the unregister so everything is good. OK cool. Tony