From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/2] Add support for the ethernet switch on the ESPRESSObin Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:52:25 +0100 Message-ID: <20170105145225.GI4229@lunn.ch> References: <20161221125734.1034-1-romain.perier@free-electrons.com> <87tw9dbn2m.fsf@free-electrons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87tw9dbn2m.fsf@free-electrons.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Gregory CLEMENT Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli , Romain Perier , Jason Cooper , Pawel Moll , Vivien Didelot , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ian Campbell , Nadav Haklai , Rob Herring , Kumar Gala , David Miller , Thomas Petazzoni , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sebastian Hesselbarth List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 03:25:53PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > Hi David, > = > On mer., d=E9c. 21 2016, Romain Perier wrote: > = > > This set of patches adds support for the Marvell ethernet switch 88E634= 1. > > It also add the devicetree definition of this switch to the DT board. > = > The forth version of this series had been sent while the net-next merge > window was closed so I think it was missed. Having done a bit more research, i'm pretty sure the second patch is wrong. The 88E6341 is not compatible with the 6352, it is a different family. It might be more like the 6390. So supporting it will need a side-by-side comparison of the datasheet against the 6352 and the 6390, and the correct selection of the ops. Andrew