From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] PM / Domains: Introduce domain-performance-states binding Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 16:39:51 +0530 Message-ID: <20170106110951.GJ21926@vireshk-i7> References: <586F596C.7000807@codeaurora.org> <20170106092702.GH21926@vireshk-i7> <586F6DA5.30203@codeaurora.org> <20170106102308.GI21926@vireshk-i7> <586F732A.8090401@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <586F732A.8090401@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rajendra Nayak Cc: Rafael Wysocki , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , Nishanth Menon , Vincent Guittot , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Kevin Hilman , Ulf Hansson , Lina Iyer , devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 06-01-17, 16:06, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > No, I am thoroughly confused :) > I was struggling with 2 powerdomains and now there are way too many of them :P For the record, we had some offline chat and his case is pretty much taken care of by the proposed bindings. Though he will look in more details and post further queries later. :) -- viresh