devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
To: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
Cc: rui.zhang@intel.com, edubezval@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, jun.nie@linaro.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	geert+renesas@glider.be, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mchehab@kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, xie.baoyou@zte.com.cn,
	chen.chaokai@zte.com.cn, wang.qiang01@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] thermal: zx2967: add thermal driver for ZTE's zx2967 family
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 11:00:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170109030023.GK20956@dragon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1483767488-19778-3-git-send-email-baoyou.xie@linaro.org>

On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 01:38:08PM +0800, Baoyou Xie wrote:
> This patch adds thermal driver for ZTE's zx2967 family.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/Kconfig          |   6 +
>  drivers/thermal/Makefile         |   1 +
>  drivers/thermal/zx2967_thermal.c | 241 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 248 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/zx2967_thermal.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> index 18f2de6..0dd597e 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> @@ -445,3 +445,9 @@ config BCM2835_THERMAL
>  	  Support for thermal sensors on Broadcom bcm2835 SoCs.
>  
>  endif
> +
> +config ZX2967_THERMAL
> +	tristate "Thermal sensors on zx2967 SoC"
> +	depends on ARCH_ZX
> +	help
> +	  Support for thermal sensors on ZTE zx2967 SoCs.
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Makefile b/drivers/thermal/Makefile
> index 677c6d9..c00c05e 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/Makefile
> @@ -57,3 +57,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HISI_THERMAL)     += hisi_thermal.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_THERMAL)	+= mtk_thermal.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ADC_THERMAL)	+= thermal-generic-adc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_BCM2835_THERMAL)	+= bcm2835_thermal.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ZX2967_THERMAL)	+= zx2967_thermal.o
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/zx2967_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/zx2967_thermal.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1aef070
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/zx2967_thermal.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
> +/*
> + * ZTE's zx2967 family thermal sensor driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2017 ZTE Ltd.
> + *
> + * Author: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
> + *
> + * License terms: GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/thermal.h>
> +
> +/* DCF Control Register */
> +#define ZX2967_THERMAL_DCF		0x4
> +
> +/* Selection Register */
> +#define ZX2967_THERMAL_SEL		0x8
> +
> +/* Control Register */
> +#define ZX2967_THERMAL_CTRL		0x10
> +
> +#define ZX2967_THERMAL_ID_MASK		(0x18)
> +
> +struct zx2967_thermal_sensor {
> +	struct zx2967_thermal_priv *priv;
> +	struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
> +	int id;
> +};
> +
> +#define NUM_SENSORS	1
> +
> +struct zx2967_thermal_priv {
> +	struct zx2967_thermal_sensor	sensors[NUM_SENSORS];

What's the point of defining an array with only one element?

> +	struct mutex			lock;
> +	struct clk			*clk_gate;
> +	struct clk			*pclk;
> +	void __iomem			*regs;

> +	struct pinctrl			*pinmux_dvi0_d3;
> +	struct pinctrl			*pinmux_dvi0_d4;
> +	struct pinctrl			*pinmux_dvi0_d5;

These three pointers are not used.

> +};
> +
> +static int zx2967_thermal_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> +	struct zx2967_thermal_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	if (priv && priv->pclk)
> +		clk_disable_unprepare(priv->pclk);
> +
> +	if (priv && priv->clk_gate)
> +		clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk_gate);
> +	dev_info(dev, "suspended\n");

Noisy message.

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int zx2967_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> +	struct zx2967_thermal_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	int error;
> +
> +	error = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk_gate);
> +	if (error)
> +		return error;
> +
> +	error = clk_prepare_enable(priv->pclk);
> +	if (error)
> +		return error;

clk_disable_unprepare() should be called for priv->clk_gate before
returning here.

> +
> +	dev_info(dev, "resumed\n");
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int zx2967_thermal_get_temp(void *data, int *temp)
> +{
> +	void __iomem *regs;
> +	struct zx2967_thermal_sensor *sensor = data;
> +	struct zx2967_thermal_priv *priv = sensor->priv;
> +	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(100);
> +	u32 val, sel_id;
> +
> +	regs = priv->regs;
> +	mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
> +
> +	writel_relaxed(0, regs);

I suggest we have a macro for register at offset 0 as well to improve
the readability.

> +	writel_relaxed(2, regs + ZX2967_THERMAL_DCF);
> +
> +	val = readl_relaxed(regs + ZX2967_THERMAL_SEL);
> +	val &= ~ZX2967_THERMAL_ID_MASK;
> +	sel_id = sensor->id ? 8 : 0x10;
> +	val |= sel_id;
> +	writel_relaxed(val, regs + ZX2967_THERMAL_SEL);
> +
> +	usleep_range(100, 300);
> +	while (!(readl_relaxed(regs + ZX2967_THERMAL_CTRL) & 0x1000)) {
> +		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
> +			pr_err("*** Thermal sensor %d data timeout\n",
> +			      sensor->id);

dev_err?  And drop "*** ".

> +			mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
> +			return -EIO;

-ETIMEDOUT?

> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	writel_relaxed(3, regs + ZX2967_THERMAL_DCF);
> +	val = readl_relaxed(regs + ZX2967_THERMAL_CTRL) & 0xfff;
> +	writel_relaxed(1, regs);
> +
> +	/** Calculate temperature */
> +	*temp = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST((val - 922) * 1000, 1951);
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops zx2967_of_thermal_ops = {
> +	.get_temp = zx2967_thermal_get_temp,
> +};
> +
> +static int zx2967_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct zx2967_thermal_priv *priv;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	int ret, i;
> +
> +	priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!priv)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	priv->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->regs))
> +		return PTR_ERR(priv->regs);
> +
> +	priv->clk_gate = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "tempsensor_gate");
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->clk_gate)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(priv->clk_gate);
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get clock gate: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk_gate);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable converter clock: %d\n",
> +			ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	priv->pclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "tempsensor_pclk");
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->pclk)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(priv->pclk);
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get apb clock: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->pclk);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable converter clock: %d\n",
> +			ret);
> +		return ret;

The use count of enable and prepare on priv->clk_gate will be
unbalanced.

> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_init(&priv->lock);
> +	for (i = 0; i < NUM_SENSORS; i++) {
> +		struct zx2967_thermal_sensor *sensor = &priv->sensors[i];
> +
> +		sensor->priv = priv;
> +		sensor->id = i;
> +		sensor->tzd = thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev,
> +					i,
> +					sensor,
> +					&zx2967_of_thermal_ops);
> +		if (IS_ERR(sensor->tzd)) {
> +			ret = PTR_ERR(sensor->tzd);
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register sensor %d: %d\n",
> +				i, ret);
> +			goto remove_ts;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +remove_ts:
> +	for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> +		thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(&pdev->dev,
> +						  priv->sensors[i].tzd);
> +
> +	return ret;

Unbalanced clk_prepare_enable(priv->pclk).

Shawn

> +}
> +
> +static int zx2967_thermal_exit(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct zx2967_thermal_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < NUM_SENSORS; i++) {
> +		struct zx2967_thermal_sensor *sensor = &priv->sensors[i];
> +
> +		thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(&pdev->dev, sensor->tzd);
> +	}
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(priv->pclk);
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk_gate);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id zx2967_thermal_id_table[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "zte,zx2967-thermal" },
> +	{ .compatible = "zte,zx296718-thermal" },
> +	{}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zx2967_thermal_id_table);
> +
> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(zx2967_thermal_pm_ops,
> +			 zx2967_thermal_suspend, zx2967_thermal_resume);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver zx2967_thermal_driver = {
> +	.probe = zx2967_thermal_probe,
> +	.remove = zx2967_thermal_exit,
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "zx2967_thermal",
> +		.of_match_table = zx2967_thermal_id_table,
> +		.pm = &zx2967_thermal_pm_ops,
> +	},
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(zx2967_thermal_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ZTE zx2967 thermal driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-09  3:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-07  5:38 [PATCH v1 1/3] dt: bindings: add thermal device driver for zx2967 Baoyou Xie
2017-01-07  5:38 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] MAINTAINERS: add zx2967 thermal drivers to ARM ZTE architecture Baoyou Xie
2017-01-07  5:38 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] thermal: zx2967: add thermal driver for ZTE's zx2967 family Baoyou Xie
2017-01-09  3:00   ` Shawn Guo [this message]
2017-01-11  9:46     ` Baoyou Xie
2017-01-09  3:00   ` Jun Nie
     [not found]     ` <843c634a-c624-e7db-99f6-8efdc19d7243-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-01-09  8:42       ` Shawn Guo
2017-01-11  8:54     ` Baoyou Xie
2017-01-09  2:41 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] dt: bindings: add thermal device driver for zx2967 Shawn Guo
2017-01-10  5:35 ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170109030023.GK20956@dragon \
    --to=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baoyou.xie@linaro.org \
    --cc=chen.chaokai@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jun.nie@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=wang.qiang01@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=xie.baoyou@zte.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).