From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Implement clocksource for rockchip SoC using rockchip timer Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 14:19:53 +0100 Message-ID: <20170126131953.GI2021@mai> References: <1480343486-25539-1-git-send-email-al.kochet@gmail.com> <20170123144744.GE2166@mai> <1793912.WfGyM7qEjy@diego> <58B283B0-02F6-4342-A6D2-7E082E04863E@gmail.com> <20170123175740.GI2166@mai> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alexander Kochetkov Cc: Heiko =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= , LKML , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, LAK , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , Russell King , Caesar Wang , Huang Tao List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 02:08:45PM +0300, Alexander Kochetkov wrote: > Hello Daniel! > > Sorry for bothering you. Just let you know that I sent v5 here: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/2017-January/thread.html#13812 > > Because previous series was somehow missed in your inbox. > > Heiko don’t want to add "Reviewed-by» to my patches. Could you please > apply the patches without the tag. > > Let me know is all ok with series now? Or may be I have to do something else? Alexander, I think you misinterpreted Heiko's comment. He just want to take the time to review the driver in details and add himself the reviewed-by tag which is usually the procedure. I have to review the driver also. Meanwile you can have a look at https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/25/236 -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog