From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olof Johansson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm,gic: Fix binding example for a virt-capable GIC Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 14:51:29 -0800 Message-ID: <20170129225129.GK3133@localhost> References: <1485186974-13678-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <1485186974-13678-2-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <20170127203001.qvlgzzrh5hx2pykf@rob-hp-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170127203001.qvlgzzrh5hx2pykf@rob-hp-laptop> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Rob Herring Cc: Mark Rutland , Heiko Stuebner , Tony Lindgren , arm@kernel.org, Magnus Damm , Russell King , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Javier Martinez Canillas , Chen-Yu Tsai , Kukjin Kim , Tsahee Zidenberg , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jason Cooper , Marc Zyngier , Simon Horman , Santosh Shilimkar , Matthias Brugger , Thomas Gleixner , Sascha Hauer , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Antoine Tenart , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Beno?t Cousson , Fabio Estevam List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 02:30:01PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 03:56:13PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > The joys of copy/paste: the example of a virtualization capable GIC > > in the DT binding was wrong, and propagated to dozens of platforms. > > By having a GICC region that is only 4kB (instead of 8kB), we > > end-up not being able to access the GICC_DIR register which is on > > the second page. > > > > Oh well. Let's fix the source of the crap before tackling individual > > offenders. While we're at it, also fix the compatibility string to > > mention "arm,gic-400", which is the name of the actual implementation > > of the GICv2 spec. > > "While we're at it", code for should be in a separate patch. :) I > wouldn't really care here, but you are not fixing anything... > > > > > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic.txt | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic.txt > > index 5393e2a..a3d51ed 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic.txt > > @@ -107,11 +107,11 @@ Required properties: > > Example: > > > > interrupt-controller@2c001000 { > > - compatible = "arm,cortex-a15-gic"; > > + compatible = "arm,gic-400"; > > Which one is correct really depends on the platform. The A15 can have an > internal or external (gic-400) GIC. The former string is correct for an > A15 with an internal GIC. One such platform is Calxeda midway. > > Arguably, we should not have arm,gic-400 by itself, but have an SoC > specific compatible in case it was integrated in interesting ways. Good point (and thanks for bringing it up). Marc, based on this; want to back the above out so we can apply the rest for now, while you battle on the compatible details? :) -Olof