On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:02:04PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > >  static struct ccu_reset_map sunxi_h3_h5_ccu_resets[] = { 
> > >  [RST_USB_PHY0] =  { 0x0cc, BIT(0) }, 
> > >  [RST_USB_PHY1] =  { 0x0cc, BIT(1) }, 
> > > @@ -791,6 +910,7 @@ static struct ccu_reset_map sunxi_h3_h5_ccu_resets[] = { 
> > >  [RST_BUS_UART2] =  { 0x2d8, BIT(18) }, 
> > >  [RST_BUS_UART3] =  { 0x2d8, BIT(19) }, 
> > >  [RST_BUS_SCR0] =  { 0x2d8, BIT(20) }, 
> > > + [RST_BUS_SCR1] =  { 0x2d8, BIT(21) }, 
> >
> > That reset line is not valid on the H3. 
> 
> So I should split a H3 reset array and a H5 one?

Ideally, yes.

> (I modelled after ccu-sun5i.c, which shares one reset array)

They all share the same reset lines.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.