From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] Documentation: dt: add bindings for ti-cpufreq Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:43:49 +0530 Message-ID: <20170210031349.GG14503@vireshk-i7> References: <20170203172929.23940-3-d-gerlach@ti.com> <20170209153549.8354-1-d-gerlach@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Nishanth Menon , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Dave Gerlach , Tony Lindgren , Linux PM , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Lukasz Majewski , Rob Herring , Linux OMAP Mailing List , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 09-02-17, 23:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > In particular, Viresh, if you ACK something, please make sure that it > doesn't conflict with your own patches. I hope you are talking about the patch 3/4 for which Arnd also sent a fix. I acked it back on 18th of January and Dave has been carrying my Ack since then. When he posted again, I didn't went into reviewing it again as I saw my Ack being there. Yes, he ended up using an API which just got updated after 18th of Jan and yes both me and Dave missed that. But I feel it is difficult to take care of scenarios like this. Perhaps he should have made sure that he base it of pm/linux-next and nothing would have gone wrong. -- viresh