From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] regulator: Add driver for voltage controlled regulators
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:32:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170211003245.GA56005@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170210204348.107871-1-mka@chromium.org>
El Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:43:48PM -0800 Matthias Kaehlcke ha dit:
> The output voltage of a voltage controlled regulator can be controlled
> through the voltage of another regulator. The current version of this
> driver assumes that the output voltage is a linear function of the control
> voltage.
>
> ...
>
> +static int vctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> ...
> + /* determine if the voltage range of the control supply is continuous */
> + if ((regulator_count_voltages(vctrl->ctrl_supply) == 1) &&
> + regulator_is_supported_voltage(vctrl->ctrl_supply,
> + vrange_ctrl->min_uV,
> + vrange_ctrl->min_uV) &&
> + regulator_is_supported_voltage(vctrl->ctrl_supply,
> + vrange_ctrl->max_uV,
> + vrange_ctrl->max_uV)) {
> + rdesc->continuous_voltage_range = true;
> + rdesc->ops = &vctrl_ops_cont;
> + } else {
> + rdesc->ops = &vctrl_ops_non_cont;
> + }
This creature of indisputable beauty seemed to do the job on my
test systen, however I just realized that the condition is BS. It
turns out that on my system the voltage count of 1 stems from the
parent, since the voltage count of the control supply itself is zero.
int regulator_count_voltages(struct regulator *regulator)
{
struct regulator_dev *rdev = regulator->rdev;
if (rdev->desc->n_voltages)
return rdev->desc->n_voltages;
if (!rdev->supply)
return -EINVAL;
return regulator_count_voltages(rdev->supply);
}
This certainly doesn't help to determine if the regulator has a
continous voltage range. It seems we need a function that evaluates
rdesc->continuous_voltage_range
--
Matthias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-11 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-10 20:43 [PATCH v1] regulator: Add driver for voltage controlled regulators Matthias Kaehlcke
2017-02-11 0:32 ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
[not found] ` <20170210204348.107871-1-mka-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-22 0:22 ` Rob Herring
2017-02-25 3:19 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
[not found] ` <20170225031919.GB56005-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-27 18:53 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170211003245.GA56005@google.com \
--to=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dtor@chromium.org \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).