From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm: dts: imx: Add iMX6Q-based Kontron SMARC-sAMX6i module Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:10:10 +0000 Message-ID: <20170228231010.GD21222@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20170219202801.2082-1-plaes@plaes.org> <20170219202801.2082-4-plaes@plaes.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Rob Herring Cc: Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Priit Laes , Heiko Stuebner , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Sascha Hauer , Fabio Estevam , Thierry Reding , Shawn Guo , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 05:06:02PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Priit Laes wrote: > > SMARC-sAMX6i is a SMARC (Smart Mobility Architecture) compliant > > module. > > > > Signed-off-by: Priit Laes > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi | 434 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 434 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..e3d7a35 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi > > @@ -0,0 +1,434 @@ > > +/* > > + * Copyright 2017 Priit Laes > > + * > > + * Based on initial work by Nikita Yushchenko > > + * > > + * This file is dual-licensed: you can use it either under the terms > > + * of the GPL or the X11 license, at your option. Note that this dual > > + * licensing only applies to this file, and not this project as a > > + * whole. > > + * > > + * a) This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > > + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as > > + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of > > + * the License, or (at your option) any later version. > > + * > > + * This file is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > > + * GNU General Public License for more details. > > + * > > + * Or, alternatively, > > + * > > + * b) Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person > > + * obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation > > + * files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without > > + * restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, > > + * copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or > > + * sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the > > + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following > > + * conditions: > > + * > > + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be > > + * included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. > > + * > > + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, > > + * EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES > > + * OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND > > + * NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT > > + * HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, > > + * WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING > > + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR > > + * OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. > > Use SPDX tags here: > > SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) > > While it says X11, this is really MIT license text. No. Read the FSF's page on licenses: X11 License (#X11License) ... This license is sometimes called the MIT license, but that term is misleading, since MIT has used many licenses for software. Never use the term "MIT license", it's ambiguous, and I doubt that such a term (given the above) would stand up in a court of law as identifying any particular license. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.