Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: Add Cavium SOCs NAND bindings

[Jan Glauber <jan.glauber-M3mlKVOIwJVv6pq1l3V1OdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>]

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:20:35PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Jan,
> 
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 18:05:23 +0200
> Jan Glauber <jglauber-YGCgFSpz5w/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> > Add device tree binding description for Cavium SOC nand flash controller.
> > 
> > CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> > CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
> > CC: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Glauber <jglauber-YGCgFSpz5w/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/cavium_nand.txt        | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/cavium_nand.txt
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/cavium_nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/cavium_nand.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..4698d1f
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/cavium_nand.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> > +* Cavium NAND controller
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +
> > +- compatible:		should be "cavium,cn8xxx-nand"
> > +- reg:			PCI devfn
> > +- clocks:		must contain system clock
> > +- #address-cells:	<1>
> > +- #size-cells:		<0>
> > +
> > +The nand flash controller may contain up to 8 subnodes representing
> > +NAND flash chips. Their properties are as follows.
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible:		should be "cavium,nandcs"
> 
> Why do you need a compatible here? All sub-nodes should be representing
> NAND devices connected to the NAND controller. If you need an extra
> subnode to represent something that is not a NAND device, then it should
> not have a reg property, so testing if reg is present to detect if the
> subnode is reprensenting a NAND device should be enough.
> 
> Am I missing something?

Hi Boris,

You're right. We don't need or check this compatible. The chip type
which would make more sense than what I used above is detected via ONFI,
so I can just remove the compatible string.

> > +- reg:			a single integer representing the chip-select number
> > +- nand-ecc-mode:	see nand.txt
> > +
> > +Example:
> > +
> > +nfc: nand@b,0 {
> 
>         ^ nand-controller@xxx

OK.

> > +	compatible = "cavium,cn8xxx-nand";
> > +	reg = <0x5800 0 0 0 0>;
> > +	clocks = <&sclk>;
> > +	#address-cells = <1>;
> > +	#size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > +	nand@1 {
> > +		compatible = "cavium,nandcs";
> > +		reg = <1>;
> > +		nand-ecc-mode = "on-die";
> > +};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html